TY - JOUR
T1 - Wide complex tachycardia differentiation
T2 - A reappraisal of the state-of-the-art
AU - Kashou, Anthony H.
AU - Noseworthy, Peter A.
AU - Desimone, Christopher V.
AU - Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
AU - Asirvatham, Samuel J.
AU - May, Adam M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Department of Cardiovascular Diseases at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020/6/2
Y1 - 2020/6/2
N2 - The primary goal of the initial ECG evaluation of every wide complex tachycardia is to determine whether the tach-yarrhythmia has a ventricular or supraventricular origin. The answer to this question drives immediate patient care decisions, ensuing clinical workup, and long-term management strategies. Thus, the importance of arriving at the correct diagnosis can-not be understated and has naturally spurred rigorous research, which has brought forth an ever-expanding abundance of manually applied and automated methods to differentiate wide complex tachycardias. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of traditional and more contemporary methods to differentiate ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia. In doing so, we: (1) review hallmark wide complex tachycardia differentiation criteria, (2) examine the con-ceptual and structural design of standard wide complex tachycardia differentiation methods, (3) discuss practical limitations of manually applied ECG interpretation approaches, and (4) highlight recently formulated methods designed to differentiate ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia automatically.
AB - The primary goal of the initial ECG evaluation of every wide complex tachycardia is to determine whether the tach-yarrhythmia has a ventricular or supraventricular origin. The answer to this question drives immediate patient care decisions, ensuing clinical workup, and long-term management strategies. Thus, the importance of arriving at the correct diagnosis can-not be understated and has naturally spurred rigorous research, which has brought forth an ever-expanding abundance of manually applied and automated methods to differentiate wide complex tachycardias. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of traditional and more contemporary methods to differentiate ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia. In doing so, we: (1) review hallmark wide complex tachycardia differentiation criteria, (2) examine the con-ceptual and structural design of standard wide complex tachycardia differentiation methods, (3) discuss practical limitations of manually applied ECG interpretation approaches, and (4) highlight recently formulated methods designed to differentiate ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular wide complex tachycardia automatically.
KW - ECG
KW - Supraventricular tachycardia
KW - Ventricular tachycardia
KW - Wide complex tachycardia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085904927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085904927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.120.016598
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.120.016598
M3 - Short survey
C2 - 32427020
AN - SCOPUS:85085904927
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 11
ER -