TY - JOUR
T1 - Visualization and comparison of CT dose distribution between axial and helical acquisitions
AU - Yang, Kai
AU - Li, Xinhua
AU - Yu, Lifeng
AU - Li, Baojun
AU - Marschall, Theodore A.
AU - Liu, Bob
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Background: It is challenging to assess the accuracy of volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) when the axial scan modes corresponding to a helical scan protocol are not available. An alternative approach was proposed to directly measure (Figure presented.) using helical acquisitions and relatively small differences (< 20%) from CTDIvol were observed. Purpose: To visually demonstrate the 3D dose distribution for both axial and helical CT acquisitions and quantitively compare (Figure presented.) and CTDIvol. Methods: 3D dose distribution within the standard CTDI phantoms (16 and 32 cm diameter) from a single CT projection, Dp(x,y,z) was first generated using Monte Carlo simulation (GEANT4) with 9×108 photons per combination of tube voltage (80–140 kV), collimation width (1–8 cm), and z-axis location of the central ray of the x-ray beam, with a spatial resolution of 1 mm3. These dose distributions from one single projection were analytically ensembled to simulate 3D dose volumes DA(x,y,z) and DH(x,y,z) for axial and helical scans, respectively, with different helical pitches (0.3–2) and scan lengths (100–150 mm). 2D planar dose distributions were obtained by integrating the inside 100 mm of the dose volumes. CTDIvol and (Figure presented.) were calculated using the planar dose data at corresponding pencil chamber locations and the percentage differences (PD) were reported. Results: High spatial resolution 3D CT dose volumes were generated and visualized. PDs between (Figure presented.) and CTDIvol had strong dependency on scan length and peripheral chamber locations, with subtle dependency on collimation width and pitch. PDs were mostly within the range of ± 3% for a scan length of 150 mm with four peripheral chamber locations. Conclusions: With a scan length covering the entire phantom length, (Figure presented.) directly measured from helical scans can serve as an alternative to CTDIvol only if all four peripheral locations were measured.
AB - Background: It is challenging to assess the accuracy of volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) when the axial scan modes corresponding to a helical scan protocol are not available. An alternative approach was proposed to directly measure (Figure presented.) using helical acquisitions and relatively small differences (< 20%) from CTDIvol were observed. Purpose: To visually demonstrate the 3D dose distribution for both axial and helical CT acquisitions and quantitively compare (Figure presented.) and CTDIvol. Methods: 3D dose distribution within the standard CTDI phantoms (16 and 32 cm diameter) from a single CT projection, Dp(x,y,z) was first generated using Monte Carlo simulation (GEANT4) with 9×108 photons per combination of tube voltage (80–140 kV), collimation width (1–8 cm), and z-axis location of the central ray of the x-ray beam, with a spatial resolution of 1 mm3. These dose distributions from one single projection were analytically ensembled to simulate 3D dose volumes DA(x,y,z) and DH(x,y,z) for axial and helical scans, respectively, with different helical pitches (0.3–2) and scan lengths (100–150 mm). 2D planar dose distributions were obtained by integrating the inside 100 mm of the dose volumes. CTDIvol and (Figure presented.) were calculated using the planar dose data at corresponding pencil chamber locations and the percentage differences (PD) were reported. Results: High spatial resolution 3D CT dose volumes were generated and visualized. PDs between (Figure presented.) and CTDIvol had strong dependency on scan length and peripheral chamber locations, with subtle dependency on collimation width and pitch. PDs were mostly within the range of ± 3% for a scan length of 150 mm with four peripheral chamber locations. Conclusions: With a scan length covering the entire phantom length, (Figure presented.) directly measured from helical scans can serve as an alternative to CTDIvol only if all four peripheral locations were measured.
KW - CT dose index (CTDI)
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
KW - computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161543858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85161543858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mp.16530
DO - 10.1002/mp.16530
M3 - Article
C2 - 37283112
AN - SCOPUS:85161543858
SN - 0094-2405
VL - 50
SP - 4797
EP - 4808
JO - Medical physics
JF - Medical physics
IS - 8
ER -