TY - JOUR
T1 - Viscosupplementation for knee osteoarthritis
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Divine, Jon G.
AU - Zazulak, Bohdanna T.
AU - Hewett, Timothy E.
PY - 2007/2
Y1 - 2007/2
N2 - Due to the rising number of patients affected by osteoarthritis (OA), appropriate management decisions for minimizing pain and improving physical function for patients with OA are important. Hyaluronic acid (HA) knee injections have become a common tool for the management of OA of the knee, and the number of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of this treatment is growing. We performed a systematic review of the five published meta-analyses, which include single- or double-blinded randomized trials performed at one center or multiple centers (Level I evidence). Within each meta-analysis, a quality assessment tool for each trial was used based on outcome measures of OA-related pain, disease severity, trial period, and mean efficacy. We analyzed and compared the data collection and qualitative analysis methods, outcomes, and conclusions presented for each meta-analysis. Although they used different strategies, each used scientifically sound methods for analysis of many of the same trials; however, each used a different measure of trial quality and heterogeneity. Despite these differences, all come to a similar conclusion that when the strictest quality tools and interpretation of heterogeneity are used, Level I evidence demonstrates that the use of HA in patients with OA results in modest improvement in validated outcomes.
AB - Due to the rising number of patients affected by osteoarthritis (OA), appropriate management decisions for minimizing pain and improving physical function for patients with OA are important. Hyaluronic acid (HA) knee injections have become a common tool for the management of OA of the knee, and the number of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of this treatment is growing. We performed a systematic review of the five published meta-analyses, which include single- or double-blinded randomized trials performed at one center or multiple centers (Level I evidence). Within each meta-analysis, a quality assessment tool for each trial was used based on outcome measures of OA-related pain, disease severity, trial period, and mean efficacy. We analyzed and compared the data collection and qualitative analysis methods, outcomes, and conclusions presented for each meta-analysis. Although they used different strategies, each used scientifically sound methods for analysis of many of the same trials; however, each used a different measure of trial quality and heterogeneity. Despite these differences, all come to a similar conclusion that when the strictest quality tools and interpretation of heterogeneity are used, Level I evidence demonstrates that the use of HA in patients with OA results in modest improvement in validated outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846800248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846800248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802f5421
DO - 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802f5421
M3 - Article
C2 - 17159579
AN - SCOPUS:33846800248
SN - 0009-921X
SP - 113
EP - 122
JO - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
JF - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
IS - 455
ER -