Abstract
Newer methods for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction are available. Each strategy and marker has its pros and cons. The additive value of these markers diagnostically and particularly in providing beneficial alternative treatment options over the use of the ECG alone requires further definition.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 86-89 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | ACC Current Journal Review |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 1996 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nursing(all)
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine