TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of a Shear Reduction Surface for Prehospital Transport
T2 - A Randomized Crossover Study
AU - Tescher, Ann N.
AU - Berns, Kathleen S.
AU - Call, Evan
AU - Koehler, Patrick J.
AU - Salzwedel, Kip W.
AU - McCormack, Heather E.
AU - Myers, Lucas A.
AU - Hagen, Clinton E.
AU - Mandrekar, Jay
AU - Russon, Marianne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of an antishear mattress overlay (ASMO) with a standard ambulance stretcher surface in reducing pressure and shear and increasing patient comfort. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover design, adults in three body mass index categories served as their own controls. Pressure/shear sensors were applied to the sacrum, ischial tuberosity, and heel. The stretcher was placed in sequential 0°, 15°, and 30° head-of-bed elevations with and without an ASMO. The ambulance traveled a closed course, achieving 30 mph, with five stops at each head-of-bed elevation. Participants rated discomfort after each series of five runs. RESULTS: Thirty individuals participated. Each participant had 30 runs (15 with an ASMO, 15 without), for a total of 900 trial runs. The peak-to-peak shear difference between support surfaces was −0.03 N, indicating that after adjustment for elevation, sensor location, and body mass index, peak shear levels at baseline (starting pause) were 0.03 N lower for the ASMO than for the standard surface (P = .02). The peak-to-peak pressure difference between surfaces was −0.16 mm Hg, indicating that prerun peak-to-peak pressure was 0.16 mm Hg lower with the ASMO versus standard surface (P = .002). The heel received the most pressure and shear. Discomfort score distributions differed between surfaces at 0° (P = .004) and 30° (P = .01); the overall score across all elevations was significantly higher with the standard surface than with the ASMO (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The ASMO reduced shear, pressure, and discomfort. During transport, the ambulance team should provide additional heel offloading.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of an antishear mattress overlay (ASMO) with a standard ambulance stretcher surface in reducing pressure and shear and increasing patient comfort. METHODS: In this randomized, crossover design, adults in three body mass index categories served as their own controls. Pressure/shear sensors were applied to the sacrum, ischial tuberosity, and heel. The stretcher was placed in sequential 0°, 15°, and 30° head-of-bed elevations with and without an ASMO. The ambulance traveled a closed course, achieving 30 mph, with five stops at each head-of-bed elevation. Participants rated discomfort after each series of five runs. RESULTS: Thirty individuals participated. Each participant had 30 runs (15 with an ASMO, 15 without), for a total of 900 trial runs. The peak-to-peak shear difference between support surfaces was −0.03 N, indicating that after adjustment for elevation, sensor location, and body mass index, peak shear levels at baseline (starting pause) were 0.03 N lower for the ASMO than for the standard surface (P = .02). The peak-to-peak pressure difference between surfaces was −0.16 mm Hg, indicating that prerun peak-to-peak pressure was 0.16 mm Hg lower with the ASMO versus standard surface (P = .002). The heel received the most pressure and shear. Discomfort score distributions differed between surfaces at 0° (P = .004) and 30° (P = .01); the overall score across all elevations was significantly higher with the standard surface than with the ASMO (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: The ASMO reduced shear, pressure, and discomfort. During transport, the ambulance team should provide additional heel offloading.
KW - ambulance
KW - antishear mattress overlay
KW - prehospital
KW - pressure injury
KW - pressure ulcer
KW - shear
KW - transport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185953696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185953696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000044
DO - 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000044
M3 - Article
C2 - 37590441
AN - SCOPUS:85185953696
SN - 1527-7941
VL - 37
SP - 155
EP - 161
JO - Advances in Skin and Wound Care
JF - Advances in Skin and Wound Care
IS - 3
ER -