TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Diverse Perspectives on Genetic Research Through Focus Group Talk
AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
AU - Albertie, Monica
AU - Pantoja, Elizabeth
AU - Prescott, Darin
AU - Zhu, Xuan
AU - Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki
N1 - Funding Information:
The study team would like to thank the members of the tribal and community advisory boards who provided feedback and guidance on this research. They would also like to thank Wesley Petersen, Ann Nicometo, Kwesi O. Adjei, and Carlos Garcia González for their assistance in reviewing data in this article. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (#16-009788) and the tribal council. This research was supported by an award from the Mayo Clinic Office of Health Disparities Research. ORCID iD Jennifer L. Ridgeway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7658-6763
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - While genetic research (GR) is fueling discoveries in fields like precision medicine, there is a growing concern that underrepresentation of racial and ethnic populations in GR will limit access to its benefits and subsequently worsen health disparities. This study aimed to understand GR perceptions among members from underrepresented communities by studying discourse and language use in focus group discussions. Nine focus groups were conducted with adults from three populations: African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American; 53 women and 15 men participated. Data were analyzed using methods of discourse and content analysis. Discourse analysis highlighted how conceptualization of science and family—rooted in historical experiences—can influence views on GR risks and benefits to self and others. The use of focus group discourse in particular provided an opportunity for group sense making around the science and ethics of GR. Content analysis highlighted differences between the language use of focus group moderators, who spoke about scientific discovery and research oversight, and that of participants, whose talk highlighted ancestral bloodline, personal risk, and ethical concerns. The findings can inform efforts to bolster GR participation, including recruitment and educational campaigns. However, they also challenge researchers to consider areas of discordance between their own and community members’ conceptualization of the risks and benefits of GR participation, including the notion of future and family benefit.
AB - While genetic research (GR) is fueling discoveries in fields like precision medicine, there is a growing concern that underrepresentation of racial and ethnic populations in GR will limit access to its benefits and subsequently worsen health disparities. This study aimed to understand GR perceptions among members from underrepresented communities by studying discourse and language use in focus group discussions. Nine focus groups were conducted with adults from three populations: African American, Hispanic/Latino, and Native American; 53 women and 15 men participated. Data were analyzed using methods of discourse and content analysis. Discourse analysis highlighted how conceptualization of science and family—rooted in historical experiences—can influence views on GR risks and benefits to self and others. The use of focus group discourse in particular provided an opportunity for group sense making around the science and ethics of GR. Content analysis highlighted differences between the language use of focus group moderators, who spoke about scientific discovery and research oversight, and that of participants, whose talk highlighted ancestral bloodline, personal risk, and ethical concerns. The findings can inform efforts to bolster GR participation, including recruitment and educational campaigns. However, they also challenge researchers to consider areas of discordance between their own and community members’ conceptualization of the risks and benefits of GR participation, including the notion of future and family benefit.
KW - biobank
KW - genetic research
KW - racial/ethnic minority
KW - research participation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077196153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077196153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1609406919892476
DO - 10.1177/1609406919892476
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077196153
SN - 1609-4069
VL - 18
JO - International Journal of Qualitative Methods
JF - International Journal of Qualitative Methods
ER -