Two-step processing of human frataxin by mitochondrial processing peptidase: Precursor and intermediate forms are cleaved at different rates

Patrizia Cavadini, Jiri Adamec, Franco Taroni, Oleksandr Gakh, Grazia Isaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

We showed previously that maturation of the human frataxin precursor (p-fxn) involves two cleavages by the mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP). This observation was not confirmed by another group, however, who reported only one cleavage. Here, we demonstrate conclusively that MPP cleaves p-fxn in two sequential steps, yielding a 18,826-Da intermediate (i-fxn) and a 17,255-Da mature (m-fxn) form, the latter corresponding to endogenous frataxin in human tissues. The two cleavages occur between residues 41-42 and 55-56, and both match the MPP consensus sequence RX ↓ (X/S). Recombinant rat and yeast MPP catalyze the p → i step 4 and 40 times faster, respectively, than the i → m step. In isolated rat mitochondria, p-fxn undergoes a sequence of cleavages, p → i → m → d1 → d2, with d1 and d2 representing two C-terminal fragments of m-fxn produced by an unknown protease. The i → m step is limiting, and the overall rate of p → i → m does not exceed the rate of m → d1 → d2, such that the levels of m-fxn do not change during incubations as long as 3 h. Inhibition of the i → m step by a disease-causing frataxin mutation (W173G) leads to nonspecific degradation of i-fxn. Thus, the second of the two processing steps catalyzed by MPP limits the levels of mature frataxin within mitochondria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41469-41475
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume275
Issue number52
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 29 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two-step processing of human frataxin by mitochondrial processing peptidase: Precursor and intermediate forms are cleaved at different rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this