TY - JOUR
T1 - Tubal Ligation and Age at Natural Menopause
AU - Ainsworth, Alessandra J.
AU - Baumgarten, Sarah C.
AU - Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N.
AU - Vachon, Celine M.
AU - Weaver, Amy L.
AU - Laughlin-Tommaso, Shannon K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was made possible using the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, which is supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG034676 and grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA97396). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, October 6–10, 2018, Denver, Colorado. Each author has confirmed compliance with the journal’s requirements for authorship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Objective: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. Methods: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). Results: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. Conclusions: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.
AB - Objective: To determine the effect of tubal ligation on age at natural menopause, as a marker of long-term ovarian function. Methods: Three preexisting population-based cohorts were included in this cross-sectional study. Data from each cohort was analyzed separately. The cohorts were restricted to women who never smoked and had reached natural menopause, without prior hysterectomy or oophorectomy. The following variables were collected: race, age at menarche, age at menopause, history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, gravidity and parity, tobacco use, and ever use of hormonal contraception. The type of tubal ligation and age at tubal ligation were manually abstracted in cohort 1. For cohorts 2 and 3, history of tubal ligation was obtained from an institutional form, completed by patient report. The primary outcome, age at natural menopause, was compared between the two groups (those with and without a history of tubal ligation). Results: Inclusion criteria was met by 555 women from cohort 1, 1,816 women from cohort 2, and 1,534 women from cohort 3. Baseline characteristics did not differ between cohorts. The percentage with tubal ligation was the same in all cohorts: 26.0%, 25.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. Women with a tubal ligation were more likely to have had at least one pregnancy and to have used hormonal contraception compared with women without a tubal ligation. There was no significant difference in age at natural menopause in women who underwent tubal ligation (50.1, 49.9, 50.0 years, respectively) compared with those who did not (50.7, 49.6, 50.0 years, respectively). The type of tubal ligation (cohort 1 only) had no effect on age at menopause. Conclusions: Tubal ligation did not affect age at natural menopause in the three large cohorts included in this study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066993257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066993257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003266
M3 - Article
C2 - 31135741
AN - SCOPUS:85066993257
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 133
SP - 1247
EP - 1254
JO - Obstetrics and gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 6
ER -