TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment of nonsurgical refractory back pain with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz
T2 - 12-month results of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
AU - Kapural, Leonardo
AU - Jameson, Jessica
AU - Johnson, Curtis
AU - Kloster, Daniel
AU - Calodney, Aaron
AU - Kosek, Peter
AU - Pilitsis, Julie
AU - Bendel, Markus
AU - Petersen, Erika
AU - Wu, Chengyuan
AU - Cherry, Taissa
AU - Lad, Shivanand P.
AU - Yu, Cong
AU - Sayed, Dawood
AU - Goree, Johnathan
AU - Lyons, Mark K.
AU - Sack, Andrew
AU - Bruce, Diana
AU - Rubenstein, Frances
AU - Province-Azalde, Rose
AU - Caraway, David
AU - Patel, Naresh P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge Erik MacLaren, PhD, of Galen Medical Writing LLC for writing assistance in the preparation of this manuscript, Richard G. Holcomb, PhD, for performing the statistical analyses, and Advance Research Associates, Inc. for producing data tables. We are grateful for the high-quality work of the data monitoring team and the clinical site personnel, particularly the research coordinators. We remember Amie Sifferlen, LPN, for her outstanding work and dedication to this research.
Funding Information:
The study was funded by Nevro Corp. Dr. Kapural: scientific advisory board for Nalu, Biotronik, Medtronic, and Presidio; consultant for Saluda and Nevro; and and research contracts with Nevro, Neuros, Avanos, Medtronic, NeuraLace, and Gimmer Medical. Dr. Jameson: consultant for Nevro, Abbott, Saluda, Boston Scientific, SI Bone, Vertos, and ControlRad; and research support from Saluda, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Nevro. Dr. Calodney: consultant for Nevro Medtronic and Boston Scientific; research support from Medtronic, Nevro, Stryker, and PainTeq. Dr. Pillitsis: consultant for Boston Scientific, Nevro, Medtronic, Saluda, and Abbott; grant support from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Nevro, NIH 2R01CA166379-06, and NIH U44NS115111; medical advisor for Aim Medical Robotics and Karuna; and stock equity in Aim Medical Robotics. Dr. Petersen: research support from Medtronic, Neuros Medical, Nevro, ReNeuron, SPR, and Saluda; consultant for Abbott Neuromodulation, Medtronic Modulation, Neuros Medial, Nevro, Saluda, Biotronik, and Vertos; and stock options from SynerFuse and neuro42. Dr. Lad: consultant for Nevro. Dr. Yu: consultant for Nevro. Dr. Sayed consultant for and clinical or research support for the study described from Nevro. Dr. Goree: consultant for Abbott and Stratus Medical; and research support from Mainstay Medical and SPR. Dr. Rubenstein: employee of and stock ownership in Nevro. Ms. Azalde: employee of Nevro Corp. Dr. Caraway: employee of Nevro.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The authors.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at 10 kHz (10-kHz SCS) is a safe and effective therapy for treatment of chronic low-back pain. However, it is unclear from existing evidence whether these findings can be generalized to patients with chronic back pain that is refractory to conventional medical management (CMM) and who have no history of spine surgery and are not acceptable candidates for spine surgery. The authors have termed this condition “nonsurgical refractory back pain” (NSRBP) and conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS in this population. METHODS Patients with NSRBP, as defined above and with a spine surgeon consultation required for confirmation, were randomized 1:1 to patients undergoing CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS. CMM included nonsurgical treatment for back pain, according to physicians’ best practices and clinical guidelines. Primary and secondary endpoints included the responder rate (≥ 50% pain relief), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), global impression of change, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and change in daily opioid use and were analyzed 3 and 6 months after randomization. The protocol allowed for an optional crossover at 6 months for both arms, with observational follow-up over 12 months. RESULTS In total, 159 patients were randomized; 76 received CMM, and 69 (83.1%) of the 83 patients who were assigned to the 10-kHz SCS group received a permanent implant. At the 3-month follow-up, 80.9% of patients who received stimulation and 1.3% of those who received CMM were found to be study responders (primary outcome, ≥ 50% pain relief; p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between the treatment groups in all secondary outcomes at 6 months (p < 0.001). In the 10-kHz SCS arm, outcomes were sustained, including a mean 10-cm visual analog scale score of 2.1 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.2 and mean ODI score of 24.1 ± 16.1 and 24.0 ± 17.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.9). In the CMM arm, 74.7% (56/75) of patients met the criteria for crossover and received an implant. The crossover arm obtained a 78.2% responder rate 6 months postimplantation. Five serious adverse events occurred (procedure-related, of 125 total permanent implants), all of which resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS The study results, which included follow-up over 12 months, provide important insights into the durability of 10-kHz SCS therapy with respect to chronic refractory back pain, physical function, quality of life, and opioid use, informing the current clinical practice for pain management in patients with NSRBP.
AB - OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at 10 kHz (10-kHz SCS) is a safe and effective therapy for treatment of chronic low-back pain. However, it is unclear from existing evidence whether these findings can be generalized to patients with chronic back pain that is refractory to conventional medical management (CMM) and who have no history of spine surgery and are not acceptable candidates for spine surgery. The authors have termed this condition “nonsurgical refractory back pain” (NSRBP) and conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS in this population. METHODS Patients with NSRBP, as defined above and with a spine surgeon consultation required for confirmation, were randomized 1:1 to patients undergoing CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS. CMM included nonsurgical treatment for back pain, according to physicians’ best practices and clinical guidelines. Primary and secondary endpoints included the responder rate (≥ 50% pain relief), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), global impression of change, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and change in daily opioid use and were analyzed 3 and 6 months after randomization. The protocol allowed for an optional crossover at 6 months for both arms, with observational follow-up over 12 months. RESULTS In total, 159 patients were randomized; 76 received CMM, and 69 (83.1%) of the 83 patients who were assigned to the 10-kHz SCS group received a permanent implant. At the 3-month follow-up, 80.9% of patients who received stimulation and 1.3% of those who received CMM were found to be study responders (primary outcome, ≥ 50% pain relief; p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between the treatment groups in all secondary outcomes at 6 months (p < 0.001). In the 10-kHz SCS arm, outcomes were sustained, including a mean 10-cm visual analog scale score of 2.1 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.2 and mean ODI score of 24.1 ± 16.1 and 24.0 ± 17.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.9). In the CMM arm, 74.7% (56/75) of patients met the criteria for crossover and received an implant. The crossover arm obtained a 78.2% responder rate 6 months postimplantation. Five serious adverse events occurred (procedure-related, of 125 total permanent implants), all of which resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSIONS The study results, which included follow-up over 12 months, provide important insights into the durability of 10-kHz SCS therapy with respect to chronic refractory back pain, physical function, quality of life, and opioid use, informing the current clinical practice for pain management in patients with NSRBP.
KW - 10-kHz SCS
KW - high-frequency
KW - low-back pain
KW - lumbar
KW - nonsurgical refractory back pain
KW - pain management
KW - spinal cord stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135411549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135411549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2021.12.SPINE211301
DO - 10.3171/2021.12.SPINE211301
M3 - Article
C2 - 35148512
AN - SCOPUS:85135411549
SN - 1547-5654
VL - 37
SP - 188
EP - 199
JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
IS - 2
ER -