Abstract
Objective: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is an uncommon ovarian cancer histotype that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Although long overall survival outcomes can occur with early detection and optimal surgical resection, recurrent and advanced disease are associated with extremely poor survival. There are no current guidelines specifically for the systemic management of recurrent MOC. We analyzed data from a large cohort of women with MOC to evaluate the potential for clinical utility from a range of systemic agents. Methods: We analyzed gene copy number (n = 191) and DNA sequencing data (n = 184) from primary MOC to evaluate signatures of mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency, and other genetic events. Immunohistochemistry data were collated for ER, CK7, CK20, CDX2, HER2, PAX8 and p16 (n = 117–166). Results: Molecular aberrations noted in MOC that suggest a match with current targeted therapies include amplification of ERBB2 (26.7%) and BRAF mutation (9%). Observed genetic events that suggest potential efficacy for agents currently in clinical trials include: KRAS/NRAS mutations (66%), TP53 missense mutation (49%), RNF43 mutation (11%), ARID1A mutation (10%), and PIK3CA/PTEN mutation (9%). Therapies exploiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be effective in MOC, as only 1/191 had a high HRD score. Mismatch repair deficiency was similarly rare (1/184). Conclusions: Although genetically diverse, MOC has several potential therapeutic targets. Importantly, the lack of response to platinum-based therapy observed clinically corresponds to the lack of a genomic signature associated with HRD, and MOC are thus also unlikely to respond to PARP inhibition.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 552-560 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Gynecologic oncology |
Volume | 156 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Genomic
- Molecular targeted therapy
- Ovarian cancer
- Precision oncology
- Sequencing
- Therapy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic options for mucinous ovarian carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Gynecologic oncology, Vol. 156, No. 3, 03.2020, p. 552-560.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Therapeutic options for mucinous ovarian carcinoma
AU - Gorringe, Kylie L.
AU - Cheasley, Dane
AU - Wakefield, Matthew J.
AU - Ryland, Georgina L.
AU - Allan, Prue E.
AU - Alsop, Kathryn
AU - Amarasinghe, Kaushalya C.
AU - Ananda, Sumitra
AU - Bowtell, David D.L.
AU - Christie, Michael
AU - Chiew, Yoke Eng
AU - Churchman, Michael
AU - DeFazio, Anna
AU - Fereday, Sian
AU - Gilks, C. Blake
AU - Gourley, Charlie
AU - Hadley, Alison M.
AU - Hendley, Joy
AU - Hunter, Sally M.
AU - Kaufmann, Scott H.
AU - Kennedy, Catherine J.
AU - Köbel, Martin
AU - Le Page, Cecile
AU - Li, Jason
AU - Lupat, Richard
AU - McNally, Orla M.
AU - McAlpine, Jessica N.
AU - Pyman, Jan
AU - Rowley, Simone M.
AU - Salazar, Carolina
AU - Saunders, Hugo
AU - Semple, Timothy
AU - Stephens, Andrew N.
AU - Thio, Niko
AU - Torres, Michelle C.
AU - Traficante, Nadia
AU - Zethoven, Magnus
AU - Antill, Yoland C.
AU - Campbell, Ian G.
AU - Scott, Clare L.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Grants # APP1045783 and # 628434 , the Victorian Cancer Agency (Clinical Fellowships to CLS CRF10-20 , CRF16014 ), Cancer Council Victoria (Sir Edward Dunlop Fellowship in Cancer Research to CLS); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation , and the Stafford Fox Medical Research Foundation . This work was made possible through the Australian Cancer Research Foundation , the Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS. The Bioinformatics and Molecular Genomics Core Facilities of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre were supported by the Australian Cancer Research Foundation. The following cohorts were supported as follows: CASCADE : Supported by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation. AOCS : The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under DAMD17-01-1-0729, The Cancer Council Victoria, Queensland Cancer Fund, The Cancer Council New South Wales, The Cancer Council South Australia, The Cancer Council Tasmania and The Cancer Foundation of Western Australia (Multi-State Applications 191, 211 and 182) and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; ID400413 and ID400281). The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study gratefully acknowledges additional support from Ovarian Cancer Australia and the Peter MacCallum Foundation. The AOCS also acknowledges the cooperation of the participating institutions in Australia and acknowledges the contribution of the study nurses, research assistants and all clinical and scientific collaborators to the study. The complete AOCS Study Group can be found at www.aocstudy.org . We would like to thank all of the women who participated in these research programs. COEUR : This study uses resources provided by the Canadian Ovarian Cancer Research Consortium's - COEUR biobank funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and managed and supervised by the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM). The Consortium acknowledges contributions to its COEUR biobank from Institutions across Canada (for a full list see http://www.tfri.ca/en/research/translational-research/coeur/coeur_biobanks.aspx ). The Gynaecological Oncology Biobank at Westmead is a member of the Australasian Biospecimen Network-Oncology group, which was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Enabling Grants ID 310670 & ID 628903 and the Cancer Institute NSW Grants ID 12/RIG/1-17 & 15/RIG/1-16. OVCARE receives core funding from The BC Cancer Foundation and the VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation. Mayo Clinic : National Institutes of Health (R01-CA122443, P30-CA15083, P50-CA136393); Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation. Edinburgh : We extend our thanks to the Edinburgh Ovarian Cancer Database from which data were collected for this research and the Nicola Murray Foundation for supporting the Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research. Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the Bioinformatics and Molecular Genomics Core Facilities of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, which were supported by the Australian Cancer Research Foundation. We thank Margot Osinski and Estefania Vicario (Royal Women's Hospital) for database assistance, Rhiannon Dudley and Nicole Fairweather (Hudson Institute of Medical Research), Maret Böhm (Garvan Institute of Medical Research), Gwo-Yaw Ho (WEHI) and Kimberly Kalli (Mayo Clinic) for assistance in sample collection and/or annotation. Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the Bioinformatics and Molecular Genomics Core Facilities of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, which were supported by the Australian Cancer Research Foundation. We thank Margot Osinski and Estefania Vicario (Royal Women's Hospital) for database assistance, Rhiannon Dudley and Nicole Fairweather (Hudson Institute of Medical Research), Maret B?hm (Garvan Institute of Medical Research), Gwo-Yaw Ho (WEHI) and Kimberly Kalli (Mayo Clinic) for assistance in sample collection and/or annotation. This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Grants #APP1045783 and #628434, the Victorian Cancer Agency (Clinical Fellowships to CLS CRF10-20, CRF16014), Cancer Council Victoria (Sir Edward Dunlop Fellowship in Cancer Research to CLS); the Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation, and the Stafford Fox Medical Research Foundation. This work was made possible through the Australian Cancer Research Foundation, the Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS. The Bioinformatics and Molecular Genomics Core Facilities of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre were supported by the Australian Cancer Research Foundation. The following cohorts were supported as follows:, CASCADE: Supported by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation. AOCS: The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under DAMD17-01-1-0729, The Cancer Council Victoria, Queensland Cancer Fund, The Cancer Council New South Wales, The Cancer Council South Australia, The Cancer Council Tasmania and The Cancer Foundation of Western Australia (Multi-State Applications 191, 211 and 182) and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC; ID400413 and ID400281). The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study gratefully acknowledges additional support from Ovarian Cancer Australia and the Peter MacCallum Foundation. The AOCS also acknowledges the cooperation of the participating institutions in Australia and acknowledges the contribution of the study nurses, research assistants and all clinical and scientific collaborators to the study. The complete AOCS Study Group can be found at www.aocstudy.org. We would like to thank all of the women who participated in these research programs. COEUR: This study uses resources provided by the Canadian Ovarian Cancer Research Consortium's - COEUR biobank funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and managed and supervised by the Centre hospitalier de l'Universit? de Montr?al (CRCHUM). The Consortium acknowledges contributions to its COEUR biobank from Institutions across Canada (for a full list see http://www.tfri.ca/en/research/translational-research/coeur/coeur_biobanks.aspx). The Gynaecological Oncology Biobank at Westmead is a member of the Australasian Biospecimen Network-Oncology group, which was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Enabling Grants ID 310670 & ID 628903 and the Cancer Institute NSW Grants ID 12/RIG/1-17 & 15/RIG/1-16. OVCARE receives core funding from The BC Cancer Foundation and the VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation. Mayo Clinic: National Institutes of Health (R01-CA122443, P30-CA15083, P50-CA136393); Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation. Edinburgh: We extend our thanks to the Edinburgh Ovarian Cancer Database from which data were collected for this research and the Nicola Murray Foundation for supporting the Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research. Funding Information: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. ADF, NT and DDLB have received research grant funding from AstraZeneca, unrelated to the contents on this manuscript. DDLB also reports funding from Roche-Genentech and BeiGene, also unrelated. CG reports funding from AstraZeneca, Roche, Clovis, Tesaro, Foundation One, Nucana, Aprea, Novartis, Chugai, and MSD, all outside the submitted work. CLS reports non-financial support and/or other support from Clovis Oncology, Roche, Eisai Australia, Beigene, Sierra Oncology, and AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Objective: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is an uncommon ovarian cancer histotype that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Although long overall survival outcomes can occur with early detection and optimal surgical resection, recurrent and advanced disease are associated with extremely poor survival. There are no current guidelines specifically for the systemic management of recurrent MOC. We analyzed data from a large cohort of women with MOC to evaluate the potential for clinical utility from a range of systemic agents. Methods: We analyzed gene copy number (n = 191) and DNA sequencing data (n = 184) from primary MOC to evaluate signatures of mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency, and other genetic events. Immunohistochemistry data were collated for ER, CK7, CK20, CDX2, HER2, PAX8 and p16 (n = 117–166). Results: Molecular aberrations noted in MOC that suggest a match with current targeted therapies include amplification of ERBB2 (26.7%) and BRAF mutation (9%). Observed genetic events that suggest potential efficacy for agents currently in clinical trials include: KRAS/NRAS mutations (66%), TP53 missense mutation (49%), RNF43 mutation (11%), ARID1A mutation (10%), and PIK3CA/PTEN mutation (9%). Therapies exploiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be effective in MOC, as only 1/191 had a high HRD score. Mismatch repair deficiency was similarly rare (1/184). Conclusions: Although genetically diverse, MOC has several potential therapeutic targets. Importantly, the lack of response to platinum-based therapy observed clinically corresponds to the lack of a genomic signature associated with HRD, and MOC are thus also unlikely to respond to PARP inhibition.
AB - Objective: Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is an uncommon ovarian cancer histotype that responds poorly to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Although long overall survival outcomes can occur with early detection and optimal surgical resection, recurrent and advanced disease are associated with extremely poor survival. There are no current guidelines specifically for the systemic management of recurrent MOC. We analyzed data from a large cohort of women with MOC to evaluate the potential for clinical utility from a range of systemic agents. Methods: We analyzed gene copy number (n = 191) and DNA sequencing data (n = 184) from primary MOC to evaluate signatures of mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombination deficiency, and other genetic events. Immunohistochemistry data were collated for ER, CK7, CK20, CDX2, HER2, PAX8 and p16 (n = 117–166). Results: Molecular aberrations noted in MOC that suggest a match with current targeted therapies include amplification of ERBB2 (26.7%) and BRAF mutation (9%). Observed genetic events that suggest potential efficacy for agents currently in clinical trials include: KRAS/NRAS mutations (66%), TP53 missense mutation (49%), RNF43 mutation (11%), ARID1A mutation (10%), and PIK3CA/PTEN mutation (9%). Therapies exploiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may not be effective in MOC, as only 1/191 had a high HRD score. Mismatch repair deficiency was similarly rare (1/184). Conclusions: Although genetically diverse, MOC has several potential therapeutic targets. Importantly, the lack of response to platinum-based therapy observed clinically corresponds to the lack of a genomic signature associated with HRD, and MOC are thus also unlikely to respond to PARP inhibition.
KW - Genomic
KW - Molecular targeted therapy
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Precision oncology
KW - Sequencing
KW - Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077389988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077389988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 31902686
AN - SCOPUS:85077389988
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 156
SP - 552
EP - 560
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -