TY - JOUR
T1 - The molecular analysis for therapy choice (NCI-MATCH) trial
T2 - Lessons for genomic trial design
AU - NCI-MATCH Team
AU - Flaherty, Keith T.
AU - Gray, Robert
AU - Chen, Alice
AU - Li, Shuli
AU - Patton, David
AU - Hamilton, Stanley R.
AU - Williams, Paul M.
AU - Mitchell, Edith P.
AU - John Iafrate, A.
AU - Sklar, Jeffrey
AU - Harris, Lyndsay N.
AU - McShane, Lisa M.
AU - Rubinstein, Larry V.
AU - Sims, David J.
AU - Routbort, Mark
AU - Coffey, Brent
AU - Fu, Tony
AU - Zwiebel, James A.
AU - Little, Richard F.
AU - Marinucci, Donna
AU - Catalano, Robert
AU - Magnan, Rick
AU - Kibbe, Warren
AU - Weil, Carol
AU - Tricoli, James V.
AU - Alexander, Brian
AU - Kumar, Shaji
AU - Schwartz, Gary K.
AU - Meric-Bernstam, Funda
AU - Lih, Chih Jian
AU - McCaskill-Stevens, Worta
AU - Caimi, Paolo
AU - Takebe, Naoko
AU - Datta, Vivekananda
AU - Arteaga, Carlos L.
AU - Abrams, Jeffrey S.
AU - Comis, Robert
AU - O'Dwyer, Peter J.
AU - Conley, Barbara A.
AU - Schnall, Mitch
AU - Johnson, Tali
AU - de Abreu, Francine B.
AU - Deharvengt, Sophie J.
AU - Gallagher, Torrey L.
AU - Godwin, Kelley
AU - Green, Donald C.
AU - Hain, Carolyn C.
AU - Houde, Brianna E.
AU - Peterson, Jason D.
AU - Steinmetz, Heather B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was conducted by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O'Dwyer, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers: CA180820, CA180794, CA180858, CA180870, CA180867, CA180857, CA180853.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. Methods: Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA-targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. Results: At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). Conclusions: The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.
AB - Background: The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. Methods: Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA-targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. Results: At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). Conclusions: The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082941900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082941900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djz245
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djz245
M3 - Article
C2 - 31922567
AN - SCOPUS:85082941900
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 112
SP - 1021
EP - 1029
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 10
ER -