The Fate of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Results from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence Research Consortium

Victor K.F. Wong, Jessica Que, Emily K. Kong, Garen Abedi, Naren Nimmagadda, Anthony S. Emmott, Ryan F. Paterson, Dirk Lange, Colin J. Lundeen, Amihay Nevo, Kevin Shee, Jonathan Moore, Vernon Pais, Roger L. Sur, Seth K. Bechis, Nicole L. Miller, Ryan Hsi, Bodo E. Knudsen, Michael Sourial, Mitchell R. HumphreysKaren L. Stern, Brian H. Eisner, Ben H. Chew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Residual fragments (RFs) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and clinical course. There is a paucity of studies that evaluate the natural history of RFs after PCNL. The objective of this study is to compare rates of reintervention, complications, stone growth, and passage in patients with RFs >4, ≤4, and ≤2 mm after PCNL. Methods: Sites from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence (EDGE) research consortium examined data of PCNL patients from 2015 to 2019 with at least 1-year follow-up. RF passage, regrowth, reintervention, and complications were recorded and RFs were stratified into >4 and ≤4 mm groups, as well as >2 and ≤2 mm groups. Potential predictors for stone-related events after PCNL were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. It was hypothesized that larger RF thresholds would result in lower passage rates, faster regrowth, and greater clinically significant events (complications and reinterventions) than smaller RF thresholds. Results: A total of 439 patients with RFs >1 mm on CT postoperative day 1 were included in this study. For RFs >4 mm, rates of reintervention were found to be significantly higher and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed significantly higher rates of stone-related events. Passage and RF regrowth were not found to be significantly different compared with RFs ≤4 mm. However, RFs ≤2 mm had significantly higher rates of passage, and significantly lower rates of fragment regrowth (>1 mm), complications, and reintervention compared with RFs >2 mm. On multivariable analysis, older age, body mass index, and RF size were found to be predictive of stone-related events. Conclusions: With the largest cohort to date, this study by the EDGE research consortium further confirms that clinically insignificant residual fragment is problematic for patients after PCNL, particularly in older more obese patients with larger RFs. Our study underscores the importance of complete stone clearance post-PCNL and challenges the use of Clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIFR).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)617-622
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of endourology
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2023

Keywords

  • endourology
  • percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • renal stones
  • urolithiasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Fate of Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Results from the Endourologic Disease Group for Excellence Research Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this