TY - JOUR
T1 - The COMPASS study
T2 - A prospective, randomized, multi-center trial testing the impact of a clinic-based intervention informing patients of colorectal cancer screening options on screening completion
AU - Griffin, Joan M.
AU - Finney Rutten, Lila J.
AU - Zhu, Xuan
AU - Feng, Ziding
AU - Rogers, Charles R.
AU - Marsh, Tracey L.
AU - Inadomi, John M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is funded by Exact Sciences (Madison, WI). Dr. Rogers has additional funding support from 5 For The Fight, Huntsman Cancer Institute , and the V Foundation for Cancer Research and his effort is, in part, supported by Grant K01CA234319 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Funding Information:
Exact Sciences: research grant funding
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients' values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. Methods: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. Conclusion: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov
AB - Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized despite evidence that screening improves survival. Since healthcare provider recommendation is a strong predictor of CRC screening completion, providers are encouraged to engage eligible patients in collaborative decision-making that attends to patients' values, needs, and preferences for guideline-concordant screening modalities. Methods: This three-arm randomized controlled trial is testing the effectiveness of an evidence-based video intervention informing patients of screening choices delivered in a clinic prior to a healthcare appointment. We hypothesize that participants randomized to watch a basic video describing CRC and screening in addition to an informed choice video showing the advantages and disadvantages of fecal immunochemical test (FIT), stool DNA FIT (s-DNA FIT), and colonoscopy (Arm 3) will exhibit a greater proportion of time adherent to CRC screening guidelines after 1, 3 and 6 years than those who only watch the basic video (Arm 2) or no video at all (Arm 1). Primary care and Obstetrician/Gynecology clinics across the United States are recruiting 5280 patients, half who have never been screened and half who previously screened but are currently not guideline adherent. Participants complete surveys prior to and following an index appointment to self-report personal, cognitive, and environmental factors potentially associated with screening. Proportion of time adherent to screening guidelines will be assessed using medical record data and supplemented with annual surveys self-reporting screening. Conclusion: Results will provide evidence on the effectiveness of informational and motivational videos to encourage CRC screening that can be easily integrated into clinical practice. Clinicaltrials.gov
KW - Behavior change theory
KW - Clinical trial
KW - Colonic neoplasms
KW - Colorectal cancer screening
KW - Early detection of screening
KW - Early medical intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134546461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134546461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852
DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106852
M3 - Article
C2 - 35842109
AN - SCOPUS:85134546461
SN - 1551-7144
VL - 119
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials
M1 - 106852
ER -