TY - JOUR
T1 - Survival Analysis in Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech and Agrammatic Aphasia
AU - Whitwell, Jennifer L.
AU - Martin, Peter
AU - Duffy, Joseph R.
AU - Clark, Heather M.
AU - Utianski, Rene L.
AU - Botha, Hugo
AU - MacHulda, Mary M.
AU - Strand, Edythe A.
AU - Josephs, Keith A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2021/6/1
Y1 - 2021/6/1
N2 - ObjectiveTo compare survival among patients with different combinations of apraxia of speech (AOS) and agrammatic aphasia, including those with isolated AOS (primary progressive AOS, PPAOS), both AOS and agrammatic aphasia (AOS + progressive agrammatic aphasia [PAA]), and isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA).MethodsOne hundred nine patients were recruited who had any combination of AOS and agrammatic aphasia (42 PPAOS, 56 AOS + PAA, and 11 PAA) and were followed longitudinally, with 57 patients having since died. Cox proportional hazard models were used to quantify the relative risk of death across diagnoses. Adjusted survival curves are presented based on this model. We also assessed the influence of AOS and aphasia severity on survival.ResultsPPAOS had the longest survival (median survival of 5.97 years from the baseline visit), followed by PAA (5.26 years) and then AOS + PAA (4.33 years). AOS + PAA had a greater risk of death than PPAOS, with a hazard ratio of 3.01 (lower/upper confidence interval = 1.66/5.46, p < 0.001). Risk of death did not differ between PAA and the other groups. All results accounted for age and time from onset to baseline visit. AOS severity, independent of syndromic diagnosis, was associated with greater risk of death, with a hazard ratio of 1.35 for a 1-point increase in severity. Aphasia severity was not associated with risk of death.ConclusionsIndividuals with PPAOS have better survival and reduced risk of death compared with individuals with AOS + PAA. This finding will help improve prognostic estimates for these patients and supports the value of distinguishing PPAOS from AOS + PAA.
AB - ObjectiveTo compare survival among patients with different combinations of apraxia of speech (AOS) and agrammatic aphasia, including those with isolated AOS (primary progressive AOS, PPAOS), both AOS and agrammatic aphasia (AOS + progressive agrammatic aphasia [PAA]), and isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA).MethodsOne hundred nine patients were recruited who had any combination of AOS and agrammatic aphasia (42 PPAOS, 56 AOS + PAA, and 11 PAA) and were followed longitudinally, with 57 patients having since died. Cox proportional hazard models were used to quantify the relative risk of death across diagnoses. Adjusted survival curves are presented based on this model. We also assessed the influence of AOS and aphasia severity on survival.ResultsPPAOS had the longest survival (median survival of 5.97 years from the baseline visit), followed by PAA (5.26 years) and then AOS + PAA (4.33 years). AOS + PAA had a greater risk of death than PPAOS, with a hazard ratio of 3.01 (lower/upper confidence interval = 1.66/5.46, p < 0.001). Risk of death did not differ between PAA and the other groups. All results accounted for age and time from onset to baseline visit. AOS severity, independent of syndromic diagnosis, was associated with greater risk of death, with a hazard ratio of 1.35 for a 1-point increase in severity. Aphasia severity was not associated with risk of death.ConclusionsIndividuals with PPAOS have better survival and reduced risk of death compared with individuals with AOS + PAA. This finding will help improve prognostic estimates for these patients and supports the value of distinguishing PPAOS from AOS + PAA.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164622523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164622523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000919
DO - 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000919
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164622523
SN - 2163-0402
VL - 11
SP - 249
EP - 255
JO - Neurology: Clinical Practice
JF - Neurology: Clinical Practice
IS - 3
ER -