Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) from an Interventionalist Perspective

Nichole Brunton, Patricia J.M. Best, Kimberly A. Skelding, Emily E. Cendrowski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly among women < 50 years of age. Here, we aim to review the pathogenesis of SCAD, discuss SCAD as an initial manifestation of systemic arterial disease, and highlight invasive strategies as well as unique challenges in the care of women with SCAD. Recent Findings: A paradigm shift has occurred in the care of SCAD patients in the past decade as recommendations for conservative management have become widespread. Invasive interventions are reserved for patients with hemodynamic compromise or active ischemia due to increased periprocedural complications and failure rates. Certain patient populations have been identified for larger territory infarcts and proximal disease including patients with known connective tissue disease, premenopausal women, and patients with pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). Summary: Current recommended management of SCAD is conservative. Despite a growing awareness of SCAD and its known association with systemic arteriopathies in women, evidence-based data remains scarce. Future studies focused on identifying genetic factors, optimal medical therapy after SCAD, and techniques to minimize interventional complications are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-96
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent cardiology reports
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Extracoronary vascular abnormalities
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Spontaneous coronary artery dissection
  • Women’s cardiovascular health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) from an Interventionalist Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this