Sparsity and low-contrast object detectability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


The application of sparsity-driven reconstruction methods to MRI to date has largely focused on situations where high-contrast features (e.g., gadolinium-enhanced vessels) are of primary interest. In clinical practice, however, low contrast features such as subtle lesions are often of equal or greater interest. Using an American College of Radiology MR quality assurance phantom and test, we describe a novel framework for systematically and automatically evaluating the low-contrast object detectability performance of different undersampled image reconstruction methods. This platform is used to evaluate three such methods, two based on classic Tikhonov regularization and one sparsity-driven method based on 1-norm minimization (which is commonly used in compressive sensing, also known as compressed sensing, applications), across a wide range of sampling rates and parameterizations. Both the automated evaluation system and a manual evaluation of anatomical images with numerically-generated low contrast inserts demonstrate that sparse reconstructions exhibit superior low-contrast object detectability performance compared to both Tikhonov-regularized reconstructions. The implications of this result, and potential applications of both the described low-contrast object detectability platform and generalizations of it are then discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1022-1032
Number of pages11
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2012


  • compressed sensing
  • compressive sensing
  • contrast
  • detectability
  • image quality
  • sparsity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Sparsity and low-contrast object detectability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this