TY - JOUR
T1 - Semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative low grade gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging
AU - Akkus, Zeynettin
AU - Sedlar, Jiri
AU - Coufalova, Lucie
AU - Korfiatis, Panagiotis
AU - Kline, Timothy L.
AU - Warner, Joshua D.
AU - Agrawal, Jay
AU - Erickson, Bradley J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health 1U01CA160045 and European Regional Development Fund, Project FNUSA-ICRC (No. CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Akkus et al.
PY - 2015/8/14
Y1 - 2015/8/14
N2 - Background: Segmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images. Methods: First, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts' segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations. Results and discussion: For 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 ± 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 ± 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts' manual segmentation results. Conclusions: We present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.
AB - Background: Segmentation of pre-operative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) from magnetic resonance imaging is a crucial step for studying imaging biomarkers. However, segmentation of LGGs is particularly challenging because they rarely enhance after gadolinium administration. Like other gliomas, they have irregular tumor shape, heterogeneous composition, ill-defined tumor boundaries, and limited number of image types. To overcome these challenges we propose a semi-automated segmentation method that relies only on T2-weighted (T2W) and optionally post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images. Methods: First, the user draws a region-of-interest (ROI) that completely encloses the tumor and some normal tissue. Second, a normal brain atlas and post-contrast T1W images are registered to T2W images. Third, the posterior probability of each pixel/voxel belonging to normal and abnormal tissues is calculated based on information derived from the atlas and ROI. Finally, geodesic active contours use the probability map of the tumor to shrink the ROI until optimal tumor boundaries are found. This method was validated against the true segmentation (TS) of 30 LGG patients for both 2D (1 slice) and 3D. The TS was obtained from manual segmentations of three experts using the Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE) software. Dice and Jaccard indices and other descriptive statistics were computed for the proposed method, as well as the experts' segmentation versus the TS. We also tested the method with the BraTS datasets, which supply expert segmentations. Results and discussion: For 2D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.90 ± 0.06 (standard deviation), sensitivity was 0.92, and specificity was 0.99. For 3D segmentation vs. TS, the mean Dice index was 0.89 ± 0.06, sensitivity was 0.91, and specificity was 0.99. The automated results are comparable with the experts' manual segmentation results. Conclusions: We present an accurate, robust, efficient, and reproducible segmentation method for pre-operative LGGs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938915776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938915776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40644-015-0047-z
DO - 10.1186/s40644-015-0047-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 26268363
AN - SCOPUS:84938915776
SN - 1740-5025
VL - 15
JO - Cancer Imaging
JF - Cancer Imaging
IS - 1
M1 - 12
ER -