Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial

Claire N. Harrison, Jyoti Nangalia, Rebecca Boucher, Aimee Jackson, Christina Yap, Jennifer O'Sullivan, Sonia Fox, Isaak Ailts, Amylou C. Dueck, Holly L. Geyer, Ruben A. Mesa, William G. Dunn, Eugene Nadezhdin, Natalia Curto-Garcia, Anna Green, Bridget Wilkins, Jason Coppell, John Laurie, Mamta Garg, Joanne EwingSteven Knapper, Josephine Crowe, Frederick Chen, Ioannis Koutsavlis, Anna Godfrey, Siamak Arami, Mark Drummond, Jennifer Byrne, Fiona Clark, Carolyn Mead-Harvey, Elizabeth Joanna Baxter, Mary Frances McMullin, Adam J. Mead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSEPolycythemia vera (PV) is characterized by JAK/STAT activation, thrombotic/hemorrhagic events, systemic symptoms, and disease transformation. In high-risk PV, ruxolitinib controls blood counts and improves symptoms.PATIENTS AND METHODSMAJIC-PV is a randomized phase II trial of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients resistant/intolerant to hydroxycarbamide (HC-INT/RES). Primary outcome was complete response (CR) within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included duration of response, event-free survival (EFS), symptom, and molecular response.RESULTSOne hundred eighty patients were randomly assigned. CR was achieved in 40 (43%) patients on ruxolitinib versus 23 (26%) on BAT (odds ratio, 2.12; 90% CI, 1.25 to 3.60; P =.02). Duration of CR was superior for ruxolitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.61; P <.001). Symptom responses were better with ruxolitinib and durable. EFS (major thrombosis, hemorrhage, transformation, and death) was superior for patients attaining CR within 1 year (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78; P =.01); and those on ruxolitinib (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P =.03). Serial analysis of JAK2V617F variant allele fraction revealed molecular response was more frequent with ruxolitinib and was associated with improved outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] P =.001, EFS P =.001, overall survival P =.01) and clearance of JAK2V617F stem/progenitor cells. ASXL1 mutations predicted for adverse EFS (HR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.47 to 6.17; P =.003). The safety profile of ruxolitinib was as previously reported.CONCLUSIONThe MAJIC-PV study demonstrates ruxolitinib treatment benefits HC-INT/RES PV patients with superior CR, and EFS as well as molecular response; importantly also demonstrating for the first time, to our knowledge, that molecular response is linked to EFS, PFS, and OS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3534-3544
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy for Polycythemia Vera Intolerant or Resistant to Hydroxycarbamide in a Randomized Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this