TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting the NIH Taskforce on the Research needs of Eosinophil-Associated Diseases (RE-TREAD)
AU - Khoury, Paneez
AU - Akuthota, Praveen
AU - Ackerman, Steven J.
AU - Arron, Joseph R.
AU - Bochner, Bruce S.
AU - Collins, Margaret H.
AU - Kahn, Jean Emmanuel
AU - Fulkerson, Patricia C.
AU - Gleich, Gerald J.
AU - Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi
AU - Jacobsen, Elizabeth A.
AU - Leiferman, Kristen M.
AU - Francesca, Levi Schaffer
AU - Mathur, Sameer K.
AU - Minnicozzi, Michael
AU - Prussin, Calman
AU - Rothenberg, Marc E.
AU - Roufosse, Florence
AU - Sable, Kathleen
AU - Simon, Dagmar
AU - Simon, Hans Uwe
AU - Spencer, Lisa A.
AU - Steinfeld, Jonathan
AU - Wardlaw, Andrew J.
AU - Wechsler, Michael E.
AU - Weller, Peter F.
AU - Klion, Amy D.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded in part by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH (P.K., A.D.K.); NIH K08 HL116429 and UG1 HL139117 (P.A.); in part by grants from the FDA (R01FD004086), NIH (R21HL118588), APFED (HOPE Grant program), and University of Illinois (Chancellors Innovation Fund-Proof of Concept Award) (S.J.A.); R01 AI072265, P01 HL107151, and R01 AI105839 (B.S.B.); NIH grant R01AI130033 (P.C.F.); NIH P01 HL088594, NIH R21 AI122103 (S.K.M.); NIH U19 AI070235, NIH R01 AI124355, R37 A1045898, NIH K24DK100303, NIAID-U-01 AI097073, the Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Disease (CURED) Foundation, the Buckeye Foundation, and the Sunshine Charitable Foundation and its supporters, Denise A. Bunning and David G. Bunning. The study is also funded by U54 AI117804, which is part of the Rare Disease Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the ORDR, NCATS, and is funded through collaboration between NCATS, NIAID, and NIDDK, as well as the patient advocacy groups American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED), CURED, and the Eosinophilic Family Coalition (EFC), which have collectively resulted in the CEGIR (M.E.R.); AI132840-01A1, HL065228, RAR061567A, HL124165(EAJ); the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (grant F 5/4/150/4)(F.R.); Israel Science Foundation grant (ISF 472/15) (F.L.S.); AI121186 (L.A.S.); the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, and the views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health (A.J.W.); NIAID-U-01 AI097073 (M.E.W.); NIAID, R37020241 (P.F.W.).
Funding Information:
P.A. has received honoraria for advisory boards for G.S.K. and AstraZeneca, receives royalties from UpToDateTM, and has consulted for Ambrx and Advance Medical. J.R.A. is an employee of Genentech, Inc., holds stock/stock options in Roche, and is a named inventor on patent applications related to biomarkers of eosinophilic disorders. S.J.A. is a co-inventor of the Esophageal String Test (EST) for EoE and co-founder of EnteroTrack, LLC that is developing the EST for clinical use, and is the CSO and a paid consultant for EnteroTrack. He has had recent consulting agreements with and received honoraria from Receptos (Celgene) and Knopp Biosciences, and is a member of the APFED Medical Advisory Panel. B.S.B. receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and Acerta Pharma. He has current or recent consulting or scientific advisory board arrangements with, or has received honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis, TEVA, GSK, AstraZeneca, and Allakos, Inc., and owns stock in Allakos. He receives publication-related royalty payments from Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer, and is a co-inventor on existing Siglec-8–related patents and thus may be entitled to a share of royalties received by Johns Hopkins University on the potential sales of such products. B.S.B. is also a co-founder of Allakos, Inc. which makes him subject to certain restrictions under University policy. The terms of this arrangement are being managed by the Johns Hopkins University and Northwestern University in accordance with their conflict of interest policies. MHC is a consultant for Shire, Regeneron, Receptos; has received research funding from Shire, Regeneron, Receptos; is Chair for a Medical Advisory Panel, American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders (APFED); and is Member of The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers (TIGERS). P.C.F. has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, has served as a consultant for Genentech, Inc., and has received research funding from Knopp Biosciences, LLC. J.E.K. has received honoraria for advisory boards from GSK. G.J.G. and K.M.L. (spouses) receive royalties or have royalty sharing agreements with Ception, Cephalon, Teva, Mayo Foundation, and UpToDateTM, have consulted for GSK and Knopp, have received grants from AstraZeneca, GSK, and NIH, and serve on the board of APFED and the Beiersdorf Dermatology Advisory Panel. S.K.M. has served on advisory boards for Astra-Zeneca. C.P. is an employee of Knopp Biosciences and has equity interest in the company.
Publisher Copyright:
©2018 Society for Leukocyte Biology
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) are rare, heterogeneous disorders characterized by the presence of eosinophils in tissues and/or peripheral blood resulting in immunopathology. The heterogeneity of tissue involvement, lack of sufficient animal models, technical challenges in working with eosinophils, and lack of standardized histopathologic approaches have hampered progress in basic research. Additionally, clinical trials and drug development for rare EADs are limited by the lack of primary and surrogate endpoints, biomarkers, and validated patient-reported outcomes. Researchers with expertise in eosinophil biology and eosinophil-related diseases reviewed the state of current eosinophil research, resources, progress, and unmet needs in the field since the 2012 meeting of the NIH Taskforce on the Research of Eosinophil-Associated Diseases (TREAD). RE-TREAD focused on gaps in basic science, translational, and clinical research on eosinophils and eosinophil-related pathogenesis. Improved recapitulation of human eosinophil biology and pathogenesis in murine models was felt to be of importance. Characterization of eosinophil phenotypes, the role of eosinophil subsets in tissues, identification of biomarkers of eosinophil activation and tissue load, and a better understanding of the role of eosinophils in human disease were prioritized. Finally, an unmet need for tools for use in clinical trials was emphasized. Histopathologic scoring, patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, and appropriate coding were deemed of paramount importance for research collaborations, drug development, and approval by regulatory agencies. Further exploration of the eosinophil genome, epigenome, and proteome was also encouraged. Although progress has been made since 2012, unmet needs in eosinophil research remain a priority.
AB - Eosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) are rare, heterogeneous disorders characterized by the presence of eosinophils in tissues and/or peripheral blood resulting in immunopathology. The heterogeneity of tissue involvement, lack of sufficient animal models, technical challenges in working with eosinophils, and lack of standardized histopathologic approaches have hampered progress in basic research. Additionally, clinical trials and drug development for rare EADs are limited by the lack of primary and surrogate endpoints, biomarkers, and validated patient-reported outcomes. Researchers with expertise in eosinophil biology and eosinophil-related diseases reviewed the state of current eosinophil research, resources, progress, and unmet needs in the field since the 2012 meeting of the NIH Taskforce on the Research of Eosinophil-Associated Diseases (TREAD). RE-TREAD focused on gaps in basic science, translational, and clinical research on eosinophils and eosinophil-related pathogenesis. Improved recapitulation of human eosinophil biology and pathogenesis in murine models was felt to be of importance. Characterization of eosinophil phenotypes, the role of eosinophil subsets in tissues, identification of biomarkers of eosinophil activation and tissue load, and a better understanding of the role of eosinophils in human disease were prioritized. Finally, an unmet need for tools for use in clinical trials was emphasized. Histopathologic scoring, patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, and appropriate coding were deemed of paramount importance for research collaborations, drug development, and approval by regulatory agencies. Further exploration of the eosinophil genome, epigenome, and proteome was also encouraged. Although progress has been made since 2012, unmet needs in eosinophil research remain a priority.
KW - biomarkers
KW - eosinophil-related disorders
KW - eosinophilia
KW - hypereosinophilic syndromes
KW - murine models
KW - translational research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048806358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048806358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/JLB.5MR0118-028R
DO - 10.1002/JLB.5MR0118-028R
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29672914
AN - SCOPUS:85048806358
SN - 0741-5400
VL - 104
SP - 69
EP - 83
JO - Journal of Leukocyte Biology
JF - Journal of Leukocyte Biology
IS - 1
ER -