TY - JOUR
T1 - Returns to the operating room after breast surgery at a tertiary care medical center
AU - Murphy, Brittany L.
AU - Glasgow, Amy E.
AU - Habermann, Elizabeth B.
AU - Hieken, Tina J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery provides salary support for Dr. Habermann and Mrs. Glasgow. No external funding was used. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the Mayo Clinic Departments of Surgery and the Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery as substantial contributors of resources to the project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background: Evaluation of returns to the operating room (RORs) may spur practice modifications to improve patient outcomes and hospital practices. We determined the frequency and indications for RORs after breast operations. Methods: We identified patients ≥18 years who underwent a breast operation at our institution 1/1/14-1/13/17 and assessed ROR within 45-days. RORs were categorized as unplanned/planned, staged/unstaged, or unrelated procedures. Univariate and multivariable analyses compared variables between patients who did and did not have an ROR. Results: 2,914 patients underwent a breast operation of whom 117 (4.0%) had 121 RORs. Planned staged procedures accounted for 48 RORs (39.7%), while unplanned complications accounted for 65 (53.7%). On multivariable analysis, ROR was more common among patients undergoing total, skin-sparing, or nipple-sparing mastectomy (versus lumpectomy) all p < 0.03, while immediate breast reconstruction did not increase RORs. Conclusions: RORs following breast operations occurred in 4% of patients, with approximately one-third for a staged oncologic procedure. Implementation of ROR documentation tools should be encouraged, as these data provide benchmarks for clinical practice improvement initiatives to improve the quality of patient care.
AB - Background: Evaluation of returns to the operating room (RORs) may spur practice modifications to improve patient outcomes and hospital practices. We determined the frequency and indications for RORs after breast operations. Methods: We identified patients ≥18 years who underwent a breast operation at our institution 1/1/14-1/13/17 and assessed ROR within 45-days. RORs were categorized as unplanned/planned, staged/unstaged, or unrelated procedures. Univariate and multivariable analyses compared variables between patients who did and did not have an ROR. Results: 2,914 patients underwent a breast operation of whom 117 (4.0%) had 121 RORs. Planned staged procedures accounted for 48 RORs (39.7%), while unplanned complications accounted for 65 (53.7%). On multivariable analysis, ROR was more common among patients undergoing total, skin-sparing, or nipple-sparing mastectomy (versus lumpectomy) all p < 0.03, while immediate breast reconstruction did not increase RORs. Conclusions: RORs following breast operations occurred in 4% of patients, with approximately one-third for a staged oncologic procedure. Implementation of ROR documentation tools should be encouraged, as these data provide benchmarks for clinical practice improvement initiatives to improve the quality of patient care.
KW - Breast surgery
KW - Complications
KW - Quality
KW - Returns to the operating room
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062034938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062034938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.026
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 30824169
AN - SCOPUS:85062034938
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 218
SP - 388
EP - 392
JO - American journal of surgery
JF - American journal of surgery
IS - 2
ER -