TY - JOUR
T1 - Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation
AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.
AU - Ollivier, Matthieu P.
AU - Pallante, Graham D.
AU - Abdel, Matthew
AU - Clarke, Henry D.
AU - Mabry, Tad M.
AU - Taunton, Michael J.
PY - 2016/7/19
Y1 - 2016/7/19
N2 - Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.
AB - Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.
KW - CT scan
KW - Interobserver agreement
KW - Intrarater reliability
KW - Precision
KW - Tibial component rotation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018646184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018646184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 28434699
AN - SCOPUS:85018646184
SN - 0883-5403
JO - Journal of Arthroplasty
JF - Journal of Arthroplasty
ER -