Reliability and Responsiveness of Histologic Indices for the Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity

Virginia Solitano, David F. Schaeffer, Malcolm Hogan, Niels Vande Casteele, Rish K. Pai, Guangyong Zou, Reetesh K. Pai, Claire E. Parker, Julie Rémillard, Britt Christensen, Silvio Danese, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Remo Panaccione, Bruce E. Sands, Geert D'Haens, Brian G. Feagan, Christopher Ma, Vipul Jairath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background & Aims: The operating properties of histologic indices for evaluating Crohn's disease (CD) activity are poorly characterized. We assessed the reliability and responsiveness of existing histologic indices/items used in CD and ulcerative colitis (UC), in addition to 3 novel items, and developed exploratory ileal, colonic, and colonic-ileal CD instruments. Methods: Blinded central readers independently reviewed paired baseline and week 12 image sets from the EXTEND trial. Disease activity was scored using 4 indices (the Global Histologic Activity Score, Geboes Score, Nancy Histological Index, and Robarts Histopathology Index) and 3 items identified by an expert panel (mucin depletion, basal plasmacytosis, and ileal pyloric gland metaplasia). Reliability and responsiveness were quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), respectively. Exploratory indices were developed using backward stepwise linear regression analysis. Candidate independent variables were items with an inter-rater ICC ≥0.40 and AUC ≥0.56. The dependent variable was histologic disease activity measured by a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Results: Paired image sets were available from 55 patients. Substantial to almost perfect inter-rater reliability (ICC, 0.63–0.87) and some responsiveness (AUC, 0.57–0.94) were observed for all existing indices regardless of whether individual colonic and ileal segments, combined colonic segments, or combined colonic and ileal segments were assessed and the calculation method used. Five items were tested as candidate items, and exploratory colonic, ileal, and colonic-ileal indices were developed. Conclusions: CD and UC indices were similarly reliable and responsive in measuring histologic CD activity. Exploratory index development did not offer benefit over current histologic instruments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • Clinical Trials
  • Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
  • Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this