Racial and ethnic differences in clinical outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma treated with CAR T-cell therapy

Lauren C. Peres, Laura B. Oswald, Christen M. Dillard, Gabriel De Avila, Taiga Nishihori, Brandon J. Blue, Ciara L. Freeman, Frederick L. Locke, Melissa Alsina, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Leyla Shune, Douglas W. Sborov, Charlotte Wagner, Danai Dima, Hamza Hashmi, James A. Davis, Mehmet H. Kocoglu, Ashraf Z. Badros, Shebli Atrash, Gary SimmonsNilesh Kalariya, Christopher Ferreri, Larry D. Anderson, Aimaz Afrough, Gurbakhash Kaur, Yi Lin, Lawrence Liu, Omar Nadeem, Peter Voorhees, Jack Khouri, Joseph McGuirk, Surbhi Sidana, Doris K. Hansen, Krina Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The clinical outcomes of standard of care (SOC) ide-cel in racially and ethnically diverse populations have been understudied. This study pooled data from 207 patients with RRMM (28% patients of racial and ethnic minority groups) treated with SOC ide-cel across 11 institutions to examine racial and ethnic differences in the incidence of toxicities and adverse events, response to ide-cel, and survival. This study included 22 (11%) Hispanic, 36 (17%) non-Hispanic Black, and 149 (72%) non-Hispanic White patients with RRMM. Compared with Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients, non- Hispanic Black patients had higher median levels of C-reactive protein (1.0, 0.8, and 3.5 mg/ dL, respectively; P = .02) and baseline ferritin (362.0 vs 307.0 vs 680.5, respectively; P = .08) and were more likely to develop cytokine release syndrome (77%, 85%, and 97%, respectively; P = .04). Although best overall response rate was lower among Hispanic patients (59%) than among non-Hispanic Black (86%) and White patients (86%; P = .01), there were no racial and ethnic differences in progression-free or overall survival. We provide, to our knowledge, the first and largest investigation of clinical outcomes of SOC idecel by race and ethnicity. Despite differences in safety and response to ide-cel, our findings encourage the use of ide-cel in all patients with RRMM. These findings should be confirmed in larger samples of diverse patients with RRMM, with longer follow-up time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-259
Number of pages9
JournalBlood Advances
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 9 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Cite this