Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations


Purpose: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a rapidly growing noninvasive imaging technique for measuring tissue mechanical properties in vivo. Previous studies have compared two-dimensional MRE measurements with material properties from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) devices that were limited in frequency range. Advanced DMA technology now allows broad frequency range testing, and three-dimensional (3D) MRE is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D MRE stiffness measurements with those of DMA over a wide range of frequencies and shear stiffnesses. Methods: 3D MRE and DMA were performed on eight different polyvinyl chloride samples over 20–205 Hz with stiffness between 3 and 23 kPa. Driving frequencies were chosen to create 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, and 6.6 effective wavelengths across the diameter of the cylindrical phantoms. Wave images were analyzed using direct inversion and local frequency estimation algorithm with the curl operator and compared with DMA measurements at each corresponding frequency. Samples with sufficient spatial resolution and with an octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio > 3 were compared. Results: Consistency between the two techniques was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and was excellent with an overall ICC of 0.99. Conclusions: 3D MRE and DMA showed excellent consistency over a wide range of frequencies and stiffnesses. Magn Reson Med 77:1184–1192, 2017.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1184-1192
Number of pages9
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017


  • dynamic mechanical analysis
  • loss modulus
  • magnetic resonance elastography
  • shear modulus
  • storage modulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this