TY - JOUR
T1 - Qualitative study of implementation of patient self-reported measures in a consultation-liaison psychiatry practice
AU - Spaulding, Aaron
AU - Nordan, Lisa
AU - Blanchfield, Lorrie
AU - Asiedu, Gladys B.
AU - Saltivan, Jean
AU - Pecenka, Stacey
AU - Uitti, Ryan
AU - Naessens, James
AU - Niazi, Shehzad K
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Rational, aims, and objectives: Understanding of barriers and successes associated with the implementation of electronic patient self-reported measures (ePSRMs) within clinical settings are limited and have not been pursued utilizing implementation science frameworks. This qualitative study is designed to assess staff perceptions of an ePSRM implementation. Methods: The study took place in an academic hospital's Consultation Liaison Psychiatry practice. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the staff and clinicians from the practice. Participants were directly involved with the implementation and use of the ePSRM system within the Psychiatry practice. Interviews were structured around the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Results: Participants reported increased patient engagement as well as efficiency and time savings. The intervention was perceived to be more challenging for older patients. Facilitators include communicating the ePSRM to patients prior to the care visit, having enough trained staff or super-users who can assist with technical problems, and having a shorter questionnaire. Conclusions: Overall, assessment of the ePSRM implementation was positive. Staff and clinicians indicated benefits in time, effectiveness, and improvements in patient treatment. Results indicate that defining how the system would fit within the clinical workflow was key, as was a flexible and user-friendly technology platform. The ePSRM implementation was dependent upon clinical involvement and interest in adoption, while barriers were associated with technical challenges as well as some patient difficulties, such as cognitive impairment. The use of the RE-AIM framework is valuable as it allows for systematic assessment of the implementation and identifies areas in that implementation has succeeded or is lacking.
AB - Rational, aims, and objectives: Understanding of barriers and successes associated with the implementation of electronic patient self-reported measures (ePSRMs) within clinical settings are limited and have not been pursued utilizing implementation science frameworks. This qualitative study is designed to assess staff perceptions of an ePSRM implementation. Methods: The study took place in an academic hospital's Consultation Liaison Psychiatry practice. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the staff and clinicians from the practice. Participants were directly involved with the implementation and use of the ePSRM system within the Psychiatry practice. Interviews were structured around the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Results: Participants reported increased patient engagement as well as efficiency and time savings. The intervention was perceived to be more challenging for older patients. Facilitators include communicating the ePSRM to patients prior to the care visit, having enough trained staff or super-users who can assist with technical problems, and having a shorter questionnaire. Conclusions: Overall, assessment of the ePSRM implementation was positive. Staff and clinicians indicated benefits in time, effectiveness, and improvements in patient treatment. Results indicate that defining how the system would fit within the clinical workflow was key, as was a flexible and user-friendly technology platform. The ePSRM implementation was dependent upon clinical involvement and interest in adoption, while barriers were associated with technical challenges as well as some patient difficulties, such as cognitive impairment. The use of the RE-AIM framework is valuable as it allows for systematic assessment of the implementation and identifies areas in that implementation has succeeded or is lacking.
KW - RE-AIM implementation
KW - patient self-reported measures
KW - psychiatry
KW - qualitative analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065181809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065181809&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jep.13160
DO - 10.1111/jep.13160
M3 - Article
C2 - 31037796
AN - SCOPUS:85065181809
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 25
SP - 482
EP - 490
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 3
ER -