Prospective, multi-site study of healthcare utilization after actionable monogenic findings from clinical sequencing

Jodell E. Linder, Ran Tao, Wendy K. Chung, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Cong Liu, Chunhua Weng, John J. Connolly, Hakon Hakonarson, Margaret Harr, Kathleen A. Leppig, Gail P. Jarvik, David L. Veenstra, Sharon Aufox, Rex L. Chisholm, Adam S. Gordon, Christin Hoell, Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik, Maureen E. Smith, Ingrid A. Holm, Erin M. MillerCynthia A. Prows, Omar Elskeally, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Christopher Lee, Sheethal Jose, Teri A. Manolio, Robb Rowley, Nana Addo Padi-Adjirackor, Ni Ketut Wilmayani, Brittany City, Wei Qi Wei, Georgia L. Wiesner, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Janet L. Williams, Marc S. Williams, Josh F. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As large-scale genomic screening becomes increasingly prevalent, understanding the influence of actionable results on healthcare utilization is key to estimating the potential long-term clinical impact. The eMERGE network sequenced individuals for actionable genes in multiple genetic conditions and returned results to individuals, providers, and the electronic health record. Differences in recommended health services (laboratory, imaging, and procedural testing) delivered within 12 months of return were compared among individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) findings to matched individuals with negative findings before and after return of results. Of 16,218 adults, 477 unselected individuals were found to have a monogenic risk for arrhythmia (n = 95), breast cancer (n = 96), cardiomyopathy (n = 95), colorectal cancer (n = 105), or familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 86). Individuals with P/LP results more frequently received services after return (43.8%) compared to before return (25.6%) of results and compared to individuals with negative findings (24.9%; p < 0.0001). The annual cost of qualifying healthcare services increased from an average of $162 before return to $343 after return of results among the P/LP group (p < 0.0001); differences in the negative group were non-significant. The mean difference-in-differences was $149 (p < 0.0001), which describes the increased cost within the P/LP group corrected for cost changes in the negative group. When stratified by individual conditions, significant cost differences were observed for arrhythmia, breast cancer, and cardiomyopathy. In conclusion, less than half of individuals received billed health services after monogenic return, which modestly increased healthcare costs for payors in the year following return.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1950-1958
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of human genetics
Volume110
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2 2023

Keywords

  • actionable genetic findings
  • clinical outcomes
  • electronic health records
  • healthcare costs
  • healthcare utilization
  • monogenic sequencing
  • return of results
  • translational

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective, multi-site study of healthcare utilization after actionable monogenic findings from clinical sequencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this