Abstract
Meta-analysis continues to grow in usage despite increased concern regarding its soundness. Over twenty meta-analyses directly pertain to vaccines. Vaccine researchers need to understand the technique as well as the criticisms. Meta-analysis involves four steps. First, the meta-analyst should establish certain criteria in advance of the second step where the meta- analyst gathers the data - the results of the individual studies. Third, the meta-analyst assesses the individual studies for combinability and, fourth, the meta-analyst actually combines the data to generate conclusions. Vaccine meta-analyses have addressed a variety of vaccines and a variety of study objectives including efficacy, immunogenicity and safety. Three classical concerns revolve around the issue of publication bias, data dredging and individual study variability. Additionally, vaccine meta-analyses suffer concerns particular to the field of vaccine research.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1628-1634 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Vaccine |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 13-14 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1999 |
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- Methodology
- Vaccine
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Molecular Medicine
- Immunology and Microbiology(all)
- veterinary(all)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Infectious Diseases