Progression of familial and non-familial dilated cardiomyopathy: Long term follow up

Virginia V. Michels, D. J. Driscoll, F. A. Miller, T. M. Olson, E. J. Atkinson, C. L. Olswold, D. J. Schaid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations


Background: It is unknown whether progression of familial idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy differs from progression in the non-familial form. It has been suggested that fomilial diseose indicates o worse prognosis, and that this should be considered when planning the timing of heart transplantation. Objective: To compare five year survival or time to heart transplantation in an unselected series of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who had been evaluated for familial v non-familial disease through the echocardiographic investigation of first degree relatives. Design: Medical records were reviewed and questionnaires were mailed to all patients who had previously participated in a family based study of dilated cardiomyopathy. Information was gathered about survival, heart transplantation, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. Survival data were censored at the time of cardiac transplantation. Results: Follow up data were obtained for 99 of 101 patients (69 with non-familial and 30 with familial disease). Five year survival was 55% for non-familial and 51% for familial patients (NS). The main predictor of mortality was an LVEF of < 30%. Familial status did not predict mortality. There was no significant difference in follow up LVEF values between the groups. Conclusions: Five year survival is not significantly different in the familial and non-familial forms of dilated cardiomyopathy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)757-761
Number of pages5
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Progression of familial and non-familial dilated cardiomyopathy: Long term follow up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this