TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Saha, Bibek
AU - Vantanasiri, Kornpong
AU - Mohan, Babu P.
AU - Goyal, Rohit
AU - Garg, Nikita
AU - Gerberi, Danielle
AU - Kisiel, John B.
AU - Singh, Siddharth
AU - Iyer, Prasad G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 AGA Institute
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background and Aims: Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized. Results: Forty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%–8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%–3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%–1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%–0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06–4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78–9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89–3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%–9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]). Conclusions: BE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines.
AB - Background and Aims: Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD. Methods: A systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized. Results: Forty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%–8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%–3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%–1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%–0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06–4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78–9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89–3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%–9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]). Conclusions: BE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Esophageal Cancer
KW - Esophageal Neoplasm
KW - Gastroesophageal Reflux Complications
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179481332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85179481332&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37879525
AN - SCOPUS:85179481332
SN - 1542-3565
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ER -