Postoperative Complications After Sling Operations for Incontinence: Is Race a Factor?

Courtney Kay Pfeuti, Annetta Madsen, Elizabeth Habermann, Amy Glasgow, John A. Occhino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Racial and ethnic disparities exist in urogynecologic surgery; however, literature identifying specific disparities after sling operations for stress incontinence are limited. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in surgical complications within 30 days of midurethral sling operations. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study identified women who underwent an isolated midurethral sling operation between 2014 and 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women were stratified by racial and ethnic category to assess the primary outcome, 30-day surgical complications, and the secondary outcome, comparison of urinary tract infections (UTIs). RESULTS: There were 20,066 patients included. Mean age and body mass index were 53.9 years and 30.8, respectively. More Black or African American women had diabetes and hypertension, and more American Indian or Alaska Native women used tobacco. The only difference in 30-day complications was stroke/cerebrovascular accident, which occurred in only 1 Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander patient (0.1%, P < 0.0001). The most frequent complication was UTI (3.3%). Black or African American women were significantly less likely to have a diagnosis of UTI than non-Hispanic White (P = 0.04), Hispanic White (P = 0.03), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications within 30 days of sling operations are rare. No clinically significant racial and ethnic differences in serious complications were observed. Urinary tract infection diagnoses were lower among Black or African American women than in non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and American Indian or Alaska Native women despite a greater comorbidity burden. No known biologic reason exists to explain lower UTI rates in this population; therefore, this finding may represent a disparity in diagnosis and treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-204
Number of pages8
JournalUrogynecology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Cite this