Post-Approval U.S. Experience With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Vivek Y. Reddy, Douglas N. Gibson, Saibal Kar, William O'Neill, Shephal K. Doshi, Rodney P. Horton, Maurice Buchbinder, Nicole T. Gordon, David R. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

118 Scopus citations


Background Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a stroke prevention alternative to warfarin for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, clinical decision-making is confounded by the fact that although LAAC attenuates the anticoagulant-related lifetime risk of bleeding, implantation is associated with upfront complications. Thus, enthusiasm for LAAC as a treatment option has been appropriately tempered, particularly as the therapy is introduced beyond the clinical trial sites into general clinical practice. Objectives This study evaluated the acute procedural performance and complication rates for all cases performed in the United States since FDA approval. Methods In the absence of a formal national clinical registry since regulatory approval in March 2015, we obtained procedural data on implantation procedures. Every LAAC procedure requires the presence of a manufacturer clinical specialist and for procedural parameter and periprocedural complication data to be collected using a standardized process and forms. Results In 3,822 consecutive cases, implantation was successful in 3,653 (95.6%), with a median procedure time of 50 min (range 10 to 210 min). Implanting physicians performing these procedures (n = 382) included 71% new, nonclinical trial implanters, who performed 50% of the procedures. Procedural complication rates included 39 pericardial tamponades (1.02%) (24 treated percutaneously, 12 surgically, and 3 fatal); 3 procedure-related strokes (0.078%); 9 device embolizations (0.24%) (6 requiring surgical removal); and 3 procedure-related deaths (0.078%). Conclusions Despite a large fraction of previously inexperienced operators, in the real-world post-FDA approval experience of LAAC, procedural success was high and complication rates were low.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-261
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 24 2017


  • Watchman
  • atrial fibrillation
  • complications
  • left atrial appendage closure
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Post-Approval U.S. Experience With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this