Polygenic risk for prostate cancer: Decreasing relative risk with age but little impact on absolute risk

Daniel J. Schaid, Jason P. Sinnwell, Anthony Batzler, Shannon K. McDonnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for a variety of diseases have recently been shown to have relative risks that depend on age, and genetic relative risks decrease with increasing age. A refined understanding of the age dependency of PRSs for a disease is important for personalized risk predictions and risk stratification. To further evaluate how the PRS relative risk for prostate cancer depends on age, we refined analyses for a validated PRS for prostate cancer by using 64,274 prostate cancer cases and 46,432 controls of diverse ancestry (82.8% European, 9.8% African American, 3.8% Latino, 2.8% Asian, and 0.8% Ghanaian). Our strategy applied a novel weighted proportional hazards model to case-control data to fully utilize age to refine how the relative risk decreased with age. We found significantly greater relative risks for younger men (age 30–55 years) compared with older men (70–88 years) for both relative risk per standard deviation of the PRS and dichotomized according to the upper 90th percentile of the PRS distribution. For the largest European ancestral group that could provide reliable resolution, the log-relative risk decreased approximately linearly from age 50 to age 75. Despite strong evidence of age-dependent genetic relative risk, our results suggest that absolute risk predictions differed little from predictions that assumed a constant relative risk over ages, from short-term to long-term predictions, simplifying implementation of risk discussions into clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)900-908
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of human genetics
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 5 2022


  • absolute risk prediction
  • genetic relative risk
  • weighted Cox regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Polygenic risk for prostate cancer: Decreasing relative risk with age but little impact on absolute risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this