Plasmapheresis: Are bigger studies necessarily better?

Brian Weinshenker

doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1

Plasmapheresis: Are bigger studies necessarily better?

Brian Weinshenker

Neurology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	410
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nature Reviews Neurology
Volume	8
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1
State	Published - Jul 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Clinical Neurology
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1

Cite this

@article{075ad647109641d48bcb131c4c1f368e,

title = "Plasmapheresis: Are bigger studies necessarily better?",

author = "Brian Weinshenker",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

pages = "410",

journal = "Nature Reviews Neurology",

issn = "1759-4758",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plasmapheresis

T2 - Are bigger studies necessarily better?

AU - Weinshenker, Brian

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863723005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863723005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1

DO - 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.59-c1

M3 - Letter

C2 - 22710632

AN - SCOPUS:84863723005

SN - 1759-4758

VL - 8

SP - 410

JO - Nature Reviews Neurology

JF - Nature Reviews Neurology

IS - 7

ER -

Plasmapheresis: Are bigger studies necessarily better?

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this