Performance comparisons of methylation and structural variants from low-input whole-genome methylation sequencing

Zhifu Sun, Saurabh Behati, Panwen Wang, Aditya Bhagwate, Samantha Mcdonough, Vivian Wang, William Taylor, Julie Cunningham, John Kisiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: Whole-genome methylation sequencing carries both DNA methylation and structural variant information (single nucleotide variant [SNV]; copy number variant [CNV]); however, limited data is available on the reliability of obtaining this information simultaneously from low-input DNA using various library preparation and sequencing protocols. Methods: A HapMap NA12878 sample was sequenced with three protocols (EM-sequencing, QIA-sequencing and Swift-sequencing) and their performance was compared on CpG methylation measurement and SNV and CNV detection. Results: At low DNA input (10-25 ng), EM-sequencing was superior in almost all metrics except CNV detection where all protocols were similar. EM-sequencing captured the highest number of CpGs and true SNVs. Conclusion: EM-sequencing is suitable to detect methylation, SNVs and CNVs from single sequencing with low-input DNA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-19
Number of pages9
JournalEpigenomics
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • CpG methylation
  • EM-seq
  • QIAseq
  • SWIFT-seq
  • copy number variation
  • single nucleotide variation
  • whole-genome methylation sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance comparisons of methylation and structural variants from low-input whole-genome methylation sequencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this