TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous cryoablation of stage T1b renal cell carcinoma
T2 - Technique considerations, safety, and local tumor control
AU - Atwell, Thomas D.
AU - Vlaminck, Jay J.
AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.
AU - Kurup, Anil N.
AU - Callstrom, Matthew R.
AU - Weisbrod, Adam J.
AU - Lohse, Christine M.
AU - Hartman, William R.
AU - Stockland, Andrew H.
AU - Leibovich, Bradley C.
AU - Schmit, Grant D.
AU - Thompson, Robert H.
N1 - Funding Information:
M.R.C. has received research funding from Galil Medical (Arden Hills, Minnesota), Thermedical (Waltham, Massachusetts), and Siemens (Malvern, Pennsylvania) and is a paid consultant for Covidien (Mansfield, Massachusetts) and Medtronic (Santa Rosa, California). None of the other authors have identified a conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 SIR.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose To describe the technical methods, safety, and local tumor control rate associated with percutaneous cryoablation of stage T1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of a percutaneous renal ablation registry was used to identify 46 patients with a total of 46 biopsy-proven RCC lesions measuring 4.1-7.0 cm treated with cryoablation between 2003 and 2011. The main outcome parameters investigated were adjunctive maneuvers, complications, and local tumor progression, and cancer-specific survival rates. Complication rates were categorized and recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Progression-free and cancer-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The mean treated RCC size was 4.8 cm (range, 4.1-6.4 cm). Prophylactic tumor embolization was performed in 7 patients (15%), ipsilateral ureteral stents were placed in 7 patients (15%), and hydrodisplacement of bowel was performed in the treatment of 16 tumors (35%). A single technical failure (2.2%) was observed at the time of ablation. Thirty-six tumors (78%) had follow-up imaging at 3 months or later following ablation, including a single recurrence at 9 months after ablation. The mean duration of follow-up for the 35 RCC tumors that did not recur was 2.0 years (range, 0.3-6.1 y). Estimated local progression-free survival rate at 3 years was 96.4%. Of the 46 cryoablation procedures, there were 7 complications (15.2%) of grade II or worse. Conclusions The results suggest that cryoablation represents a valid treatment alternative for select patients with clinical stage T1b RCC. Complications are frequent enough that multidisciplinary patient management should be considered.
AB - Purpose To describe the technical methods, safety, and local tumor control rate associated with percutaneous cryoablation of stage T1b renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Materials and Methods A retrospective review of a percutaneous renal ablation registry was used to identify 46 patients with a total of 46 biopsy-proven RCC lesions measuring 4.1-7.0 cm treated with cryoablation between 2003 and 2011. The main outcome parameters investigated were adjunctive maneuvers, complications, and local tumor progression, and cancer-specific survival rates. Complication rates were categorized and recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Progression-free and cancer-specific survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The mean treated RCC size was 4.8 cm (range, 4.1-6.4 cm). Prophylactic tumor embolization was performed in 7 patients (15%), ipsilateral ureteral stents were placed in 7 patients (15%), and hydrodisplacement of bowel was performed in the treatment of 16 tumors (35%). A single technical failure (2.2%) was observed at the time of ablation. Thirty-six tumors (78%) had follow-up imaging at 3 months or later following ablation, including a single recurrence at 9 months after ablation. The mean duration of follow-up for the 35 RCC tumors that did not recur was 2.0 years (range, 0.3-6.1 y). Estimated local progression-free survival rate at 3 years was 96.4%. Of the 46 cryoablation procedures, there were 7 complications (15.2%) of grade II or worse. Conclusions The results suggest that cryoablation represents a valid treatment alternative for select patients with clinical stage T1b RCC. Complications are frequent enough that multidisciplinary patient management should be considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930373668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930373668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 25824313
AN - SCOPUS:84930373668
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 26
SP - 792
EP - 799
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 6
ER -