Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States

David A. Lieberman, Patricia L. De Garmo, David E. Fleischer, Glenn M. Eisen, Mark Helfand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

102 Scopus citations


Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to use a large national endoscopic database to determine why routine endoscopy is performed in diverse practice settings. Methods: A computerized endoscopic report generator was developed and disseminated to gastrointestinal (GI) specialists in diverse practice settings. After reports were generated, a data file was transmitted electronically to a central databank, where data were merged from multiple sites for analysis. Results: From April 1, 1997, to October 28, 1998, 276 physicians in 31 practice sites in 21 states provided 18,444 esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) reports, 20,748 colonoscopy reports, and 9767 flexible sigmoidoscopy reports to the central databank. EGD was most commonly performed to evaluate dyspepsia and/or abdominal pain (23.7%), dysphagia (20%), symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux without dysphagia (17%), and suspected upper GI bleeding (16.3%). Colonoscopy was most often performed for surveillance of prior neoplasia (24%) and evaluation of hematochezia (19%) or positive fecal occult blood test (15%). Flexible sigmoidoscopy was most commonly performed for routine screening (40%) and evaluation of hematochezia (22%). There were significant differences between academic and nonacademic sites. Conclusions: The endoscopic database can be an important resource for future research in endoscopy by documenting current practice patterns and changes in practice over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-624
Number of pages6
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of endoscopy use in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this