Patient perceptions of altering chemotherapy treatment due to peripheral neuropathy

Daniel L. Hertz, Cindy Tofthagen, Emanuela Rossi, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Jiyoon Lim, Martha Carlson, Katharine E. Sheffield, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Lisa Grech, Diane Von Ah, Samantha J. Mayo, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Alexandre Chan, Paola Alberti, Maryam B. Lustberg, Mary Tanay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical practice guidelines recommend altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment in patients experiencing intolerable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The primary objective of this survey was to understand patient’s perspectives on altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment, including their perceptions of the benefits of preventing irreversible CIPN and the risks of reducing treatment efficacy. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed via social networks to patients who were currently receiving or had previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy for cancer. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis. Results: Following data cleaning, 447 participants were included in the analysis. The median age was 57 years, 93% were white, and most were from the UK (53%) or USA (38%). Most participants who were currently or recently treated expected some CIPN symptom resolution (86%), but 45% of those who had completed treatment more than a year ago reported experiencing no symptom resolution. Participants reported that they would discontinue chemotherapy treatment for less severe CIPN if they knew their symptoms would be permanent than if symptoms would disappear after treatment. Most patients stated that the decision to alter chemotherapy or not was usually made collaboratively between the patient and their treating clinician (61%). The most common reason participants were reluctant to talk with their clinician about CIPN was fear that treatment would be altered. Participants noted a need for improved understanding of CIPN symptoms and their permanence, better patient education relating to CIPN prior to and after treatment, and greater clinician understanding and empathy around CIPN. Conclusions: This survey highlights the importance of shared decision-making, including a consideration of both the long-term benefits and risks of altering neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment due to CIPN. Additional work is needed to develop decision aids and other communication tools that can be used to improve shared decision making and help patients with cancer achieve their treatment goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number48
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
  • Neurotoxic chemotherapy
  • Patient preferences, survey
  • Treatment alteration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this