Outcomes of Second-Line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic de Novo and Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

Corbin J. Eule, Junxiao Hu, Sulaiman Al-Saad, Katharine Collier, Patrick Boland, Akeem R. Lewis, Rana R. McKay, Vivek Narayan, Dominick Bosse, Amir Mortazavi, Tracy L. Rose, Brian A. Costello, Alan H. Bryce, Elaine T. Lam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: De novo neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) and treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (T-NEPC) are rare diseases with a poor prognosis. After first-line platinum chemotherapy, there is no consensus on second-line treatments. Patients and Methods: Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of de novo NEPC or T-NEPC between 2000 and 2020 who received first-line platinum and any second-line systemic therapy were selected and standardized clinical data was collected via the electronic health record at each institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) based on second-line therapy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) to second-line therapy, PSA response, and time on treatment. Results: Fifty-eight patients (32 de novo NEPC, 26 T-NEPC) from 8 institutions were included. At de novo NEPC or T-NEPC diagnosis, the overall cohort had a median age of 65.0 years (IQR 59.2-70.3) and median PSA of 3.0 ng/dL (IQR 0.6-17.9). Following first-line platinum chemotherapy, 21 patients (36.2%) received platinum chemotherapy, 10 (17.2%) taxane monotherapy, 11 (19.0%) immunotherapy, 10 (17.2%) other chemotherapy, and 6 (16.2%) other systemic therapy. Among 41 evaluable patients, the ORR was 23.5%. The mOS after start of second-line therapy was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.1-11.9). Conclusions: In this retrospective study, patients with de novo NEPC or T-NEPC who received second-line therapy were treated with wide variety of treatment regimens, reflecting the lack of consensus in this setting. Most patients received chemotherapy-based treatments. Overall prognosis was poor and ORR was low in the second line regardless of treatment choice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-490
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2023

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Small cell

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Second-Line Therapies in Patients With Metastatic de Novo and Treatment-Emergent Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this