TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing TMS Coil Placement Approaches for Targeting the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Depressed Adolescents
T2 - An Electric Field Modeling Study
AU - Deng, Zhi De
AU - Robins, Pei L.
AU - Dannhauer, Moritz
AU - Haugen, Laura M.
AU - Port, John D.
AU - Croarkin, Paul E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) shows promise as a treatment for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents. Conventional rTMS coil placement strategies include the 5 (Formula presented.), the Beam F3, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuronavigation methods. The purpose of this study was to use electric field (E-field) models to compare the three targeting approaches to a computational E-field optimization coil placement method in depressed adolescents. Ten depressed adolescents (4 females, age: (Formula presented.)) participated in an open-label rTMS treatment study and were offered MRI-guided rTMS five times per week over 6–8 weeks. Head models were generated based on individual MRI images, and E-fields were simulated for the four targeting approaches. Results showed a significant difference in the induced E-fields at the L-DLPFC between the four targeting methods ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed that there was a significant difference between any two of the targeting methods (Holm adjusted (Formula presented.)), with the 5 (Formula presented.) rule producing the weakest E-field ((Formula presented.)), followed by the F3 method ((Formula presented.)), followed by MRI-guided ((Formula presented.)), and followed by the computational approach ((Formula presented.)). Variance analysis showed that there was a significant difference in sample variance between the groups ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)), with F3 having the largest variance. Participants who completed the full course of treatment had median E-fields correlated with depression symptom improvement ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)). E-field models revealed limitations of scalp-based methods compared to MRI guidance, suggesting computational optimization could enhance dose delivery to the target.
AB - High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) shows promise as a treatment for treatment-resistant depression in adolescents. Conventional rTMS coil placement strategies include the 5 (Formula presented.), the Beam F3, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neuronavigation methods. The purpose of this study was to use electric field (E-field) models to compare the three targeting approaches to a computational E-field optimization coil placement method in depressed adolescents. Ten depressed adolescents (4 females, age: (Formula presented.)) participated in an open-label rTMS treatment study and were offered MRI-guided rTMS five times per week over 6–8 weeks. Head models were generated based on individual MRI images, and E-fields were simulated for the four targeting approaches. Results showed a significant difference in the induced E-fields at the L-DLPFC between the four targeting methods ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)). Post hoc pairwise comparisons showed that there was a significant difference between any two of the targeting methods (Holm adjusted (Formula presented.)), with the 5 (Formula presented.) rule producing the weakest E-field ((Formula presented.)), followed by the F3 method ((Formula presented.)), followed by MRI-guided ((Formula presented.)), and followed by the computational approach ((Formula presented.)). Variance analysis showed that there was a significant difference in sample variance between the groups ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)), with F3 having the largest variance. Participants who completed the full course of treatment had median E-fields correlated with depression symptom improvement ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)). E-field models revealed limitations of scalp-based methods compared to MRI guidance, suggesting computational optimization could enhance dose delivery to the target.
KW - adolescent
KW - adult
KW - computational modeling
KW - dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
KW - electromagnetic fields
KW - finite element analysis
KW - major depressive disorder
KW - transcranial magnetic stimulation
KW - treatment
KW - treatment-resistant depression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168918584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85168918584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/biomedicines11082320
DO - 10.3390/biomedicines11082320
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85168918584
SN - 2227-9059
VL - 11
JO - Biomedicines
JF - Biomedicines
IS - 8
M1 - 2320
ER -