TY - JOUR
T1 - On the effects of spatial sampling quantization in super-resolution ultrasound microvessel imaging
AU - Song, Pengfei
AU - Manduca, Armando
AU - Trzasko, Joshua D.
AU - Daigle, Ronald E.
AU - Chen, Shigao
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received April 9, 2018; accepted April 30, 2018. Date of publication May 4, 2018; date of current version December 20, 2018. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award K99CA214523. (Corresponding author: Pengfei Song.) P. Song, J. D. Trzasko, and S. Chen are with the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA (e-mail: song.pengfei@me.com). A. Manduca is with the Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA. R. E. Daigle is with Verasonics Inc., Kirkland, WA 98034 USA. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600
Publisher Copyright:
© 1986-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This paper concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This paper had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods and 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that the Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.
AB - Ultrasound super-resolution (SR) microvessel imaging technologies are rapidly emerging and evolving. The unprecedented combination of imaging resolution and penetration promises a wide range of preclinical and clinical applications. This paper concerns spatial quantization error in SR imaging, a common issue that involves a majority of current SR imaging methods. While quantization error can be alleviated by the microbubble localization process (e.g., via upsampling or parametric fitting), it is unclear to what extent the localization process can suppress the spatial quantization error induced by discrete sampling. It is also unclear when low spatial sampling frequency will result in irreversible quantization errors that cannot be suppressed by the localization process. This paper had two goals: 1) to systematically investigate the effect of quantization in SR imaging and establish principles of adequate SR imaging spatial sampling that yield minimal quantization error with proper localization methods and 2) to compare the performance of various localization methods and study the level of tolerance of each method to quantization. We conducted experiments on a small wire target and on a microbubble flow phantom. We found that the Fourier analysis of an oversampled spatial profile of the microbubble signal could provide reliable guidance for selecting beamforming spatial sampling frequency. Among various localization methods, parametric Gaussian fitting and centroid-based localization on upsampled data had better microbubble localization performance and were less susceptible to quantization error than peak intensity-based localization methods. When spatial sampling resolution was low, parametric Gaussian fitting-based localization had the best performance in suppressing quantization error, and could produce acceptable SR microvessel imaging with no significant quantization artifacts. The findings from this paper can be used in practice to help intelligently determine the minimum requirement of spatial sampling for robust microbubble localization to avoid adding or even reduce the burden of computational cost and data storage that are commonly associated with SR imaging.
KW - Contrast microbubbles
KW - Localization
KW - Microvessel imaging
KW - Quantization
KW - Super resolution (SR) imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046452212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046452212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600
DO - 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2832600
M3 - Article
C2 - 29993999
AN - SCOPUS:85046452212
SN - 0885-3010
VL - 65
SP - 2264
EP - 2276
JO - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
JF - IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
IS - 12
M1 - 8354905
ER -