NRG-GY012: Randomized phase 2 study comparing olaparib, cediranib, and the combination of cediranib/olaparib in women with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic endometrial cancer

Bobbie J. Rimel, Danielle Enserro, David P. Bender, Camille Gunderson Jackson, Annie Tan, Nitya Alluri, Mark Borowsky, John Moroney, Andrea Wahner Hendrickson, Floor Backes, Elizabeth Swisher, Matthew Powell, Helen MacKay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Methods: This was open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA-GO sequencing panel. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41–86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression-free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91-2.3] p =.935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43–1.14] p =.064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA-GO panel results were not associated with response. Conclusion: The combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1234-1245
Number of pages12
JournalCancer
Volume130
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2024

Keywords

  • cediranib
  • clinical trial
  • endometrial cancer
  • olaparib
  • PARP inhibitor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this