TY - JOUR
T1 - Nodal Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Luminal Breast Cancer Vary by Genomic Risk
AU - Boughey, Judy C.
AU - Hoskin, Tanya L.
AU - Day, Courtney N.
AU - Goetz, Matthew P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Goetz and Dr. Boughey have a research collaboration with SymBioSis unrelated to this work. Dr. Goetz has grant funding to Mayo Clinic from Lilly, Pfizer, and Sermonix. Dr. Boughey has grant funding paid to Mayo Clinic from Lilly. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Mayo Clinic Breast SPORE grant P50CA116201 (to MPG). Dr. Goetz has Personal fees for CME activities from: Research to Practice (6/2021), Clinical Education Alliance (2/2021), Medscape (12/2021), Curio Science Moderator (1/2022); Personal fees for serving as a panelist for a panel discussion for: Total Health Conferencing (2021); Consulting fees to Mayo Clinic from: ARC Therapeutics (3/2022), AstraZeneca (1/2021), Biovica (12/2019), Biotheranostics (7/2020), Blueprint Medicines (1/2021), Eagle Pharmaceuticals (6/2020), Lilly (11/2021), Novartis (6/2020), Pfizer (7/2019), Sermonix (7/2020), Sanofi Genzyme (12/2021).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Although an advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is eradication of axillary disease, nodal pCR rates are much lower for ER+/HER2− breast cancer than other subtypes. We sought to evaluate the association of genomic risk with nodal pCR in ER+/HER2− disease. Methods: Patients with ER+/HER2− clinically-node-positive (cT0-cT4d/cN1-cN3/cM0) breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery 2010–2018 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Low genomic risk was classified as Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) 0–25, or Mammaprint 70-gene or RS coded as “Low.” High genomic risk included RS >25, or 70-gene or RS coded as “High.” Nodal pCR was compared between patients with high versus low genomic risk by using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 15,698 patients, genomic risk was available for 692 of 15,698 (4.4%). High genomic risk was similar between patients aged <50 years versus 50+ (50.8% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.10). Nodal pCR was higher in high genomic risk (25.0%) than low genomic risk (10.4%, p < 0.001). This difference was observed both for patients aged <50 years (29.9% vs. 9.8%) and aged ≥50 years (22.7% vs. 10.8%). On multivariable analysis adjusted for potential confounding variables, including age, grade, and PR status, genomic risk was independently associated with decreased odds of residual nodal disease (odds ratio 0.49, p = 0.002). Conclusions: For patients with node-positive ER+/HER2− breast cancer treated with NAC, nodal pCR was highest in patients aged <50 years with high genomic risk tumors. In contrast, nodal pCR rates were low in patients with low genomic risk tumors, regardless of age. This information may help when counseling patients regarding axillary management.
AB - Background: Although an advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is eradication of axillary disease, nodal pCR rates are much lower for ER+/HER2− breast cancer than other subtypes. We sought to evaluate the association of genomic risk with nodal pCR in ER+/HER2− disease. Methods: Patients with ER+/HER2− clinically-node-positive (cT0-cT4d/cN1-cN3/cM0) breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery 2010–2018 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Low genomic risk was classified as Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) 0–25, or Mammaprint 70-gene or RS coded as “Low.” High genomic risk included RS >25, or 70-gene or RS coded as “High.” Nodal pCR was compared between patients with high versus low genomic risk by using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 15,698 patients, genomic risk was available for 692 of 15,698 (4.4%). High genomic risk was similar between patients aged <50 years versus 50+ (50.8% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.10). Nodal pCR was higher in high genomic risk (25.0%) than low genomic risk (10.4%, p < 0.001). This difference was observed both for patients aged <50 years (29.9% vs. 9.8%) and aged ≥50 years (22.7% vs. 10.8%). On multivariable analysis adjusted for potential confounding variables, including age, grade, and PR status, genomic risk was independently associated with decreased odds of residual nodal disease (odds ratio 0.49, p = 0.002). Conclusions: For patients with node-positive ER+/HER2− breast cancer treated with NAC, nodal pCR was highest in patients aged <50 years with high genomic risk tumors. In contrast, nodal pCR rates were low in patients with low genomic risk tumors, regardless of age. This information may help when counseling patients regarding axillary management.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134729218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134729218&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-022-12191-y
DO - 10.1245/s10434-022-12191-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 35871670
AN - SCOPUS:85134729218
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 29
SP - 6254
EP - 6264
JO - Annals of surgical oncology
JF - Annals of surgical oncology
IS - 10
ER -