Model to Select On-Therapy vs Off-Therapy Tests for Patients With Refractory Esophageal or Extraesophageal Symptoms

Dhyanesh A. Patel, Rohit Sharda, Yash A. Choksi, James C. Slaughter, Tina Higginbotham, C. Gaelyn Garrett, David O. Francis, Karthik Ravi, Stephen Hasak, David A Katzka, C. Prakash Gyawali, Michael F. Vaezi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Background & Aims: It is not clear whether we should test for reflux in patients with refractory heartburn or extraesophageal reflux (EER) symptoms, such as cough, hoarseness, or asthma. Guidelines recommend testing patients by pH monitoring when they are on or off acid-suppressive therapies based on pretest probability of reflux, determined by expert consensus. However, it is not clear what constitutes a low or high pretest probability of reflux in these patients. We aimed to develop a model that clinicians can use at bedside to estimate pretest probability of abnormal reflux. Methods: We performed a prospective study of 471 adult patients with refractory heartburn (n = 214) or suspected EER symptoms (n = 257) who underwent endoscopy with wireless pH monitoring while they were off acid-suppressive treatment and assigned them to groups based on symptoms at presentation (discovery cohort). Using data from the discovery cohort, we performed proportional odds ordinal logistic regression to select factors (easy to obtain demographic criteria and clinical symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, asthma, cough, and hoarseness) associated with esophageal exposure to acid. We validated our findings in a cohort of 118 patients with the same features from 2 separate tertiary care centers (62% women; median age 59 years; 62% with cough as presenting symptom). Results: Abnormal pH (>5.5% of time spent at pH <4) was found in 56% of patients with heartburn and 63% of patients with EER (P =.15). Within EER groups, abnormal pH was detected in a significantly larger proportion (80%) of patients with asthma compared with patients with cough (60%) or hoarseness (51%; P <.01). Factors significantly associated with abnormal pH in patients with heartburn were presence of hiatal hernia and body mass index >25 kg/m2. In patients with EER, the risk of reflux was independently associated with the presence of concomitant heartburn (odds ratio [OR] 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–3.1), body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5–3.1), asthma (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2–3.5), and presence of hiatal hernia (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.2–3.1). When we used these factors to create a scoring system, we found that a score of ≤2 excluded patients with moderate to severe reflux, with a negative predictive value of 80% in the discovery cohort and a negative predictive value of 85% in the validation cohort. Conclusion: We developed a clinical model to estimate pretest probability of abnormal pH in patients who were failed by proton pump inhibitor therapy. This system can help guide clinicians at bedside in determining the most appropriate diagnostic test in this challenging group of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1729-1740.e1
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018


  • Body Mass Index
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • Heartburn, Asthma, and BMI Extraesophageal Reflux (HAs-BEER)
  • Proton Pump Inhibitor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Model to Select On-Therapy vs Off-Therapy Tests for Patients With Refractory Esophageal or Extraesophageal Symptoms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this