Mid-term outcomes of three commonly used surgical reconstructions for scapholunate instability

Robert J. van Kampen, J. Henk Coert, Steven L. Moran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This retrospective analysis reports the mid-term (>2 years) outcomes of capsulodesis, (modified) Brunelli tenodesis and bone-ligament-bone reconstruction for scapholunate ligament instability. In total, 60 patients (64 wrists) returned the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaires. Of these participants, 42 (46 wrists) returned for a wrist examination and radiographs. In the questionnaire group, the mean follow-up for capsulodesis was 11.8 years, tenodesis 5.9 years and bone-ligament-bone 8.9 years. In the objective outcomes group, the mean follow-up was 10.2 years for capsulodesis, 5.7 for tenodesis and 8.9 for bone-ligament-bone. In all groups, some patients showed radiographic deterioration, which did not always correlate with poor functional outcome. With a mean follow-up greater than 5 years, there was no substantial difference in clinical outcomes and patient-based outcome questionnaires between capsulodesis, tenodesis or bone-ligament-bone reconstruction for the treatment of scapholunate instability. This study emphasizes the need for further research. Surgeons should use the technique that produces the fewest complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • bone-ligament-bone
  • Brunelli
  • capsulodesis
  • scapholunate
  • tenodesis
  • Wrist

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this