TY - JOUR
T1 - Mepolizumab or placebo for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis
AU - EGPA Mepolizumab Study Team
AU - Wechsler, M. E.
AU - Akuthota, P.
AU - Jayne, D.
AU - Khoury, P.
AU - Klion, A.
AU - Langford, C. A.
AU - Merkel, P. A.
AU - Moosig, F.
AU - Specks, U.
AU - Cid, M. C.
AU - Luqmani, R.
AU - Brown, J.
AU - Mallett, S.
AU - Philipson, R.
AU - Yancey, S. W.
AU - Steinfeld, J.
AU - Weller, P. F.
AU - Gleich, G. J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02020889. Supported by grants from GlaxoSmithKline (115921) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (U01 AI097073), and by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Wechsler reports receiving consulting fees from Astra-Zeneca, Boston Scientific, Novartis, Vectura Group, Sunovion, Regeneron, Ambit BioScience, Meda Pharmaceuticals, Mylan, GliaCure, Tunitas Therapeutics, Genentech, Theravance Biopharma, Neurotronics, and Boehringer Ingelheim, grant support and consulting fees from Sanofi, fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Sentien Biotechnologies, and consulting fees and fees for serving on an advisory board from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; Dr. Akuthota, receiving consulting fees from Ambrx and travel fees paid by AstraZeneca; Dr. Langford, receiving grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Genentech and serving as an unpaid consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb; Dr. Merkel, receiving grant support and consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, ChemoCentryx, and Genentech/Roche, grant support from Celgene and MedImmune/AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from Boston Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, InflaRx, and Seattle Genetics; Dr. Moosig, receiving grant support and consulting fees from Roche and consulting fees from Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Cid, receiving consulting fees from Glaxo SmithKline, Novartis, Roche, and Boehringer Ingelheim; Dr. Luqmani, receiving grant support from Roche and consulting fees from Roche and GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Brown, Mr. Mallett, Mr. Yancey, and Dr. Steinfeld, being an employee of and owning stock in GlaxoSmithKline; Dr. Philipson, being an employee of Trizell; and Dr. Gleich, receiving consulting fees from Genentech. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported. We thank the patients who participated in the trial; the trial staff; Elizabeth Juniper, M.C.S.P., M.Sc., for permission to use the Asthma Control Questionnaire; and Elizabeth Hutchinson, Ph.D., C.M.P.P., of Fishawack Indicia, for editorial support, funded by GlaxoSmithKline.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/5/18
Y1 - 2017/5/18
N2 - BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an eosinophilic vasculitis. Mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, reduces blood eosinophil counts and may have value in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned participants with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis who had received treatment for at least 4 weeks and were taking a stable prednisolone or prednisone dose to receive 300 mg of mepolizumab or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, plus standard care, for 52 weeks. The two primary end points were the accrued weeks of remission over a 52-week period, according to categorical quantification, and the proportion of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48. Secondary end points included the time to first relapse and the average daily glucocorticoid dose (during weeks 48 through 52). The annualized relapse rate and safety were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants underwent randomization, with 68 participants assigned to receive mepolizumab and 68 to receive placebo. Mepolizumab treatment led to significantly more accrued weeks of remission than placebo (28% vs. 3% of the participants had ≥24 weeks of accrued remission; odds ratio, 5.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68 to 13.03; P<0.001) and a higher percentage of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48 (32% vs. 3%; odds ratio, 16.74; 95% CI, 3.61 to 77.56; P<0.001). Remission did not occur in 47% of the participants in the mepolizumab group versus 81% of those in the placebo group. The annualized relapse rate was 1.14 in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 2.27 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). A total of 44% of the participants in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 7% of those in the placebo group, had an average daily dose of prednisolone or prednisone of 4.0 mg or less per day during weeks 48 through 52 (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.41; P<0.001). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, mepolizumab resulted in significantly more weeks in remission and a higher proportion of participants in remission than did placebo, thus allowing for reduced glucocorticoid use. Even so, only approximately half the participants treated with mepolizumab had protocol-defined remission.
AB - BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is an eosinophilic vasculitis. Mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, reduces blood eosinophil counts and may have value in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned participants with relapsing or refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis who had received treatment for at least 4 weeks and were taking a stable prednisolone or prednisone dose to receive 300 mg of mepolizumab or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks, plus standard care, for 52 weeks. The two primary end points were the accrued weeks of remission over a 52-week period, according to categorical quantification, and the proportion of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48. Secondary end points included the time to first relapse and the average daily glucocorticoid dose (during weeks 48 through 52). The annualized relapse rate and safety were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants underwent randomization, with 68 participants assigned to receive mepolizumab and 68 to receive placebo. Mepolizumab treatment led to significantly more accrued weeks of remission than placebo (28% vs. 3% of the participants had ≥24 weeks of accrued remission; odds ratio, 5.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68 to 13.03; P<0.001) and a higher percentage of participants in remission at both week 36 and week 48 (32% vs. 3%; odds ratio, 16.74; 95% CI, 3.61 to 77.56; P<0.001). Remission did not occur in 47% of the participants in the mepolizumab group versus 81% of those in the placebo group. The annualized relapse rate was 1.14 in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 2.27 in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). A total of 44% of the participants in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 7% of those in the placebo group, had an average daily dose of prednisolone or prednisone of 4.0 mg or less per day during weeks 48 through 52 (odds ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.41; P<0.001). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that observed in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, mepolizumab resulted in significantly more weeks in remission and a higher proportion of participants in remission than did placebo, thus allowing for reduced glucocorticoid use. Even so, only approximately half the participants treated with mepolizumab had protocol-defined remission.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019805787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019805787&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1702079
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1702079
M3 - Article
C2 - 28514601
AN - SCOPUS:85019805787
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 376
SP - 1921
EP - 1932
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 20
ER -