TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental health assessments in juvenile justice
T2 - Report on the consensus conference
AU - Wasserman, Gail A.
AU - Jensen, Peter S.
AU - Ko, Susan J.
AU - Cocozza, Joseph
AU - Trupin, Eric
AU - Angold, Adrian
AU - Cauffman, Elizabeth
AU - Grisso, Thomas
PY - 2003/7
Y1 - 2003/7
N2 - Objective: At national, state, and local levels, there is increasing recognition of the importance of identifying and responding to the mental health needs of youths in the juvenile justice system, as policymakers and practitioners struggle to find ways to address causes and correlates of juvenile crime and delinquency. The proposed guidelines for mental health assessment provide explicit information about how, why, and when to obtain mental health information on justice youths at each important juncture in processing. Method: A national group of expert researchers and practitioners convened in April 2002. Experts derived six recommendations, following the expert consensus method, for conducting mental health assessments in juvenile justice settings. Experts had broad experience creating collaborations between juvenile justice, mental health, and child welfare systems and understood the policy and health implications of conducting such assessments in juvenile justice settings. Results: Consensus Conference recommendations regarding screening for emergent risk, screening and assessment of mental health service needs, comprehensive mental health assessment components, assessment before community re-entry, need for periodic reassessment, and staff training are presented. Conclusion: Deriving specific recommendations that can be implemented systematically is a necessary first step toward policy changes that will optimize the standard of care for this vulnerable population.
AB - Objective: At national, state, and local levels, there is increasing recognition of the importance of identifying and responding to the mental health needs of youths in the juvenile justice system, as policymakers and practitioners struggle to find ways to address causes and correlates of juvenile crime and delinquency. The proposed guidelines for mental health assessment provide explicit information about how, why, and when to obtain mental health information on justice youths at each important juncture in processing. Method: A national group of expert researchers and practitioners convened in April 2002. Experts derived six recommendations, following the expert consensus method, for conducting mental health assessments in juvenile justice settings. Experts had broad experience creating collaborations between juvenile justice, mental health, and child welfare systems and understood the policy and health implications of conducting such assessments in juvenile justice settings. Results: Consensus Conference recommendations regarding screening for emergent risk, screening and assessment of mental health service needs, comprehensive mental health assessment components, assessment before community re-entry, need for periodic reassessment, and staff training are presented. Conclusion: Deriving specific recommendations that can be implemented systematically is a necessary first step toward policy changes that will optimize the standard of care for this vulnerable population.
KW - Assessment
KW - Best practices
KW - Consensus conference
KW - Juvenile justice
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042970513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042970513&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046873.56865.4B
DO - 10.1097/01.CHI.0000046873.56865.4B
M3 - Article
C2 - 12819434
AN - SCOPUS:0042970513
SN - 0890-8567
VL - 42
SP - 752
EP - 761
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -