Longitudinal direct medical costs associated with constipation in women

R. S. Choung, M. E. Branda, D. Chitkara, N. D. Shah, S. K. Katusic, G. R. Locke, N. J. Talley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Although direct medical costs for constipation-related medical visits are thought to be high, to date, there have been no studies examining longitudinal resource utilisation in adults with constipation. Aim To estimate the incremental direct medical costs associated with constipation in women. Methods This is a nested case-control study. The study population consisted of all mothers of 5718 children in the population-based birth cohort born during 1976-1982 in a community. The cases presented to the medical facilities with constipation. The controls were randomly selected and matched to cases in a 2:1 ratio. Direct medical costs for constipated women and controls were collected for the years 1987-2002. Results We identified 168 women with a diagnosis of constipation. The total direct medical costs over the 15-year period for constipated subjects were more than double those of controls [$63 591 (95% CI: 49 786-81 396) vs. $24 529 (95% CI: 20 667-29 260)]. The overall out-patient costs for constipated women were $38 897 (95% CI: 31 381-48 253) compared to $15 110 (95% CI: 12 904-17 781) for controls. The median of annual out-patient visits for constipated women was 0.16 compared to 0.11 for controls. Conclusion Women with constipation have significantly higher medical care utilisation and expenditures compared with women without constipation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-260
Number of pages10
JournalAlimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Longitudinal direct medical costs associated with constipation in women'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this