Abstract
In August 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) specified 12 authorized serologic assays and associated assay-specific cutoff values for the selection of high-titer CCP for use in hospitalized patients. The criteria used for establishing these cutoff values remains unclear. Here, we compare the overall agreement and concordance of five serologic assays included in the August 2020 FDA EUA at both the manufacturer-recommended qualitative cutoff thresholds and at the FDA-indicated thresholds for high-titer CCP, using serum samples collected as part of the CCP Expanded Access Program (EAP). The qualitative positive percent agreement (PPA) across assays ranged from 92.3% to 98.8%. However, the high-titer categorization across assays varied significantly, with the PPA ranging from 26.5% to 82.7%. The Roche anti-NC ECLIA provided the lowest agreement compared to all other assays. Efforts to optimize high-titer cutoffs could reduce, although not eliminate, the discordance across assays. The consequences of using nonstandardized assays are apparent in our study, and the high-titer cutoffs chosen for each assay are not directly comparable to each other. The generalized findings in our study will be relevant to any future use of convalescent plasma for either COVID-19 or future pandemics of newly emerged pathogens.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Journal | Microbiology Spectrum |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- CCP
- COVID-19 convalescent plasma
- FDA EUA
- SARS-CoV-2
- antibody
- assay standardization
- high-titer convalescent plasma
- serological assays
- serology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Ecology
- Immunology and Microbiology(all)
- Genetics
- Microbiology (medical)
- Cell Biology
- Infectious Diseases