Learning Curves in Health Professions Education Simulation Research: A Systematic Review

Neva M. Howard, David A. Cook, Rose Hatala, Martin V. Pusic

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Summary Statement Learning curves are used in health professions education to graphically represent paths to competence and expertise. However, research using learning curves often omit important information. The authors conducted a systematic review of the reporting quality of learning curves in simulation-based education research to identify specific areas for improvement. Reviewers extracted information on graphical, statistical, and conceptual elements. The authors identified 230 eligible articles. Most learning curve elements were reported infrequently, including use of an optimal linking function, detailed description of feedback or learning intervention, use of advanced visualization techniques such as overlaying and stacking, and depiction of competency thresholds. Reporting did not improve over time for most elements. Reporting of learning curves in health professions education research is incomplete and often underutilizes their desirable properties. Recommendations for improvement of the statistical, graphical, and conceptual reporting of learning curves, as well as applications to simulation research and education, are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-135
Number of pages8
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2021

Keywords

  • Learning curves
  • learning curves in health professions education
  • learning curves in simulation
  • learning curves in simulation research
  • learning curves in technology enhanced simulation research
  • medical education
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Learning Curves in Health Professions Education Simulation Research: A Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this