TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Blood Pressure Management in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
T2 - a Systematic Review of Interventions and Implementation Strategies
AU - Kamath, Celia C.
AU - Dobler, Claudia C.
AU - McCoy, Rozalina G.
AU - Lampman, Michelle A.
AU - Pajouhi, Atieh
AU - Erwin, Patricia J.
AU - Matulis, John
AU - Elrashidi, Muhamad
AU - Darcel, Joseph
AU - Alsawas, Mouaz
AU - Wang, Zhen
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Murad, M. Hassan
AU - Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge Aaron Leppin MD for the implementation science expertise and advice with the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is widely prevalent, associated with morbidity and mortality, but may be lessened with timely implementation of evidence-based strategies including blood pressure (BP) control. Nonetheless, an evidence-practice gap persists. We synthesize the evidence for clinician-facing interventions to improve hypertension management in CKD patients in primary care. Methods: Electronic databases and related publications were queried for relevant studies. We used a conceptual model to address heterogeneity of interventions. We conducted a quantitative synthesis of interventions on blood pressure (BP) outcomes and a narrative synthesis of other CKD relevant clinical outcomes. Planned subgroup analyses were performed by (1) study design (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized studies (NRS)); (2) intervention type (guideline-concordant decision support, shared care, pharmacist-facing); and (3) use of behavioral/implementation theory. Results: Of 2704 manuscripts screened, 73 underwent full-text review; 22 met inclusion criteria. BP target achievement was reported in 15 and systolic BP reduction in 6 studies. Among RCTs, all interventions had a significant effect on BP control, (pooled OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.38). Subgroup analysis by intervention type showed significant effects for guideline-concordant decision support (pooled OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.27) but not shared care (pooled OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.03) or pharmacist-facing interventions (pooled OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.34). Subgroup analysis finding was replicated with pooling of RCTs and NRS. The five contributing studies showed large and significant reduction in systolic BP (pooled WMD − 3.86; 95% CI − 7.2 to − 0.55). Use of a behavioral/implementation theory had no impact, while RCTs showed smaller effect sizes than NRS. Discussion: Process-oriented implementation strategies used with guideline-concordant decision support was a promising implementation approach. Better reporting guidelines on implementation would enable more useful synthesis of the efficacy of CKD clinical interventions integrated into primary care. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018102441.
AB - Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is widely prevalent, associated with morbidity and mortality, but may be lessened with timely implementation of evidence-based strategies including blood pressure (BP) control. Nonetheless, an evidence-practice gap persists. We synthesize the evidence for clinician-facing interventions to improve hypertension management in CKD patients in primary care. Methods: Electronic databases and related publications were queried for relevant studies. We used a conceptual model to address heterogeneity of interventions. We conducted a quantitative synthesis of interventions on blood pressure (BP) outcomes and a narrative synthesis of other CKD relevant clinical outcomes. Planned subgroup analyses were performed by (1) study design (randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or nonrandomized studies (NRS)); (2) intervention type (guideline-concordant decision support, shared care, pharmacist-facing); and (3) use of behavioral/implementation theory. Results: Of 2704 manuscripts screened, 73 underwent full-text review; 22 met inclusion criteria. BP target achievement was reported in 15 and systolic BP reduction in 6 studies. Among RCTs, all interventions had a significant effect on BP control, (pooled OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.38). Subgroup analysis by intervention type showed significant effects for guideline-concordant decision support (pooled OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.27) but not shared care (pooled OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.96 to 3.03) or pharmacist-facing interventions (pooled OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.34). Subgroup analysis finding was replicated with pooling of RCTs and NRS. The five contributing studies showed large and significant reduction in systolic BP (pooled WMD − 3.86; 95% CI − 7.2 to − 0.55). Use of a behavioral/implementation theory had no impact, while RCTs showed smaller effect sizes than NRS. Discussion: Process-oriented implementation strategies used with guideline-concordant decision support was a promising implementation approach. Better reporting guidelines on implementation would enable more useful synthesis of the efficacy of CKD clinical interventions integrated into primary care. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018102441.
KW - blood pressure control
KW - chronic kidney disease
KW - guideline implementation
KW - implementation strategies
KW - primary care practitioner interventions
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094141976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094141976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-020-06103-7
DO - 10.1007/s11606-020-06103-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33107008
AN - SCOPUS:85094141976
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 35
SP - 849
EP - 869
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
ER -